Hazardous waste treatment facilities combined with collection and/or local hauling of hazardous waste · Massachusetts

US Ecology Boston (Regional)

Wrentham, MA · ~21 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

US Ecology Boston (Regional) runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Hazardous waste treatment facilities combined with collection and/or local hauling of hazardous waste workplace, earning a grade C.

US Ecology Boston (Regional): 0.0 TCR = 0% of Hazardous waste treatment facilities combined with collection and/or local hauling of hazardous waste BLS 2.6 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

US Ecology Boston (Regional) safety composite

US Ecology Boston (Regional) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

US Ecology Boston (Regional) held a steady TCR band

US Ecology Boston (Regional)'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2021 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 0.0 TCR.

2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562211 · Wrentham, MA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/7
  • PHOTO Clean Harbors Enviro…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~21 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Clean Harbors Environmental Services Corporate Office (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

US Ecology Boston (Regional) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows US Ecology Boston (Regional) averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Hazardous waste treatment facilities combined with collection and/or local hauling of hazardous waste BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

US Ecology Boston (Regional) TCR series: 2021=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 2.6

Where US Ecology Boston (Regional) falls in its industry

211 Hazardous waste treatment faci establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 7 Hazardous waste treatment faci employers in Massachusetts.

US Ecology Boston (Regional) (21 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 50 employees and a TCR of 1.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate US Ecology Boston (Regional)
US Ecology Boston (Regional) (21 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 50 employees and a TCR of 1.8

US Ecology Boston (Regional) has fewer employees than the Hazardous waste treatment facilities com median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562211 · MA · Wrentham

211 Hazardous waste treatment facilities combined with collection and/or local hauling of hazardous waste employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 19 employers in Wrentham, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Clean Harbors Environmental Services Corporate Office 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Atkins Energy America 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR HES Corporate 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lotus, LLC 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bellingham Energy 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE West Medway 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE West Medway Power Plant 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Allendale Biomass LLC 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR Capstan Atlantic 232 FTE
CITY-NEAR Alliance Health at Maples 183 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pond Home 86 FTE
CITY-NEAR JOGO Corporation 81 FTE
NAT-TCR Raleigh Managed Services 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR California Department of Transportation Facility 128 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Integration Appliance Inc. 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Airborn Inc. Addison 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Amcor Kenosha 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wohlgemuth Road 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Krumkill IRA 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cutter Lane 21 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.