Hazardous waste material treatment facilities · Michigan

US Ecology Managed Service Group

Livonia, MI · ~72 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

US Ecology Managed Service Group runs at 24% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Hazardous waste material treatment facilities workplace, earning a grade A.

US Ecology Managed Service Group: 0.6 TCR = 24% of Hazardous waste material treatment facilities BLS 2.6 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

US Ecology Managed Service Group safety composite

US Ecology Managed Service Group scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

US Ecology Managed Service Group held a steady TCR band

US Ecology Managed Service Group's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 2.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=2.4 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=2.3 · 2023=1.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562211 · Livonia, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 24% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/11
  • PHOTO Clean Harbors Enviro…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~72 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Clean Harbors Environmental Services Deer Park Incinerator (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

US Ecology Managed Service Group in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows US Ecology Managed Service Group averages 0.6 TCR (24% of the Hazardous waste material treatment facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

US Ecology Managed Service Group TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=2.4 · 2021=0 · 2022=2.3 · 2023=1 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.6

Where US Ecology Managed Service Group falls in its industry

211 Hazardous waste material treat establishments

Safer than 87% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 11 Hazardous waste material treat employers in Michigan.

US Ecology Managed Service Group (72 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 50 employees and a TCR of 1.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate US Ecology Managed Service Group
US Ecology Managed Service Group (72 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 50 employees and a TCR of 1.8

US Ecology Managed Service Group has more employees than the Hazardous waste material treatment facil median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2022 2.3 0.0 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 2.4 0.0 2 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562211 · MI · Livonia

211 Hazardous waste material treatment facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 282 employers in Livonia, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Clean Harbors Environmental Services Deer Park Incinerator 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR WIPP 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR CWD 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR PERMA-FIX OF FLORIDA, INC. (PFF) 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Driven Grow LLC 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE Elite Apple Company, LLC 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lynn Mayer's Great Lakes Glads, Inc. 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE Navitas House 72 FTE
CITY-NEAR System Office - Livonia 6,768 FTE
CITY-NEAR Livonia Transmission Plant 3,122 FTE
CITY-NEAR Livonia Transmission 2,968 FTE
CITY-NEAR Acro Service 2,701 FTE
NAT-TCR West Virginia - Non Metals 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Howmet - Dover Casting 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Performance Energy Services, LLC 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Vadens Acoustics & Drywall 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE YKK (USA) Inc. Snap and Button Products 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE XBN 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE XAB 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE Richmond CA 72 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.