Hazardous waste treatment facilities · Oklahoma

US Ecology Tulsa

Tulsa, OK · ~22 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

US Ecology Tulsa runs at 54% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Hazardous waste treatment facilities workplace, earning a grade B.

US Ecology Tulsa: 1.4 TCR = 54% of Hazardous waste treatment facilities BLS 2.6 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

US Ecology Tulsa safety composite

US Ecology Tulsa scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

US Ecology Tulsa held a steady TCR band

US Ecology Tulsa's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 4.2 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2021=4.2 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562211 · Tulsa, OK AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.4 · 54% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK P62
  • PHOTO Transram LP
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Transram LP (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oklahoma employers → · Look up another →

US Ecology Tulsa in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows US Ecology Tulsa averages 1.4 TCR (54% of the Hazardous waste treatment facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

US Ecology Tulsa TCR series: 2017=0 · 2021=4.2 · 2022=0 · BLS 2.6

Where US Ecology Tulsa falls in its industry

211 Hazardous waste treatment faci establishments

Safer than 62% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
US Ecology Tulsa (22 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 50 employees and a TCR of 1.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate US Ecology Tulsa
US Ecology Tulsa (22 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 50 employees and a TCR of 1.8

US Ecology Tulsa has fewer employees than the Hazardous waste treatment facilities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 4.2 4.2 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562211 · OK · Tulsa

211 Hazardous waste treatment facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 5,320 rated employers in Oklahoma with headcount on file · 1,004 employers in Tulsa, OK · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Transram LP 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Clean Harbors Environmental Services Inc 60TTB 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Safety Kleen Systems Inc 77CRR 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Robstown 6558 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Farmers Union Coop Gin- Humphreys- Gin 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rig 131 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rig 145 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Quinton Office 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Francis Hospital, Inc. 6,668 FTE
CITY-NEAR H&P IDC - U.S. Land 6,014 FTE
CITY-NEAR TUL-TULSA-MAINTENANCE BASE 5,184 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-TUL-TULSA-TUL-TRML 4,794 FTE
NAT-TCR Fiore and Sons Inc. 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Metal Management Midwest - Paulina Facility 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Shape Process Automation 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Durex Industries, BLDG 305 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Nelson Insulation Company- Colorado 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE OCH Webster County Clinic 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE SMM Group Port Newark 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Miklos Air Conditioning 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.