Industrial product finishes and coatings (i.e., paint) manufacturing · Illinois

USA IL Chicago Exchange Plant

Chicago, IL · ~33 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

USA IL Chicago Exchange Plant runs at 269% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Industrial product finishes and coatings (i.e., paint) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

USA IL Chicago Exchange Plant: 8.9 TCR = 269% of Industrial product finishes and coatings (i.e., paint) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

USA IL Chicago Exchange Plant safety composite

USA IL Chicago Exchange Plant scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

22/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

USA IL Chicago Exchange Plant: 6.9 → 10.9 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 10.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.41× in 2022

USA IL Chicago Exchange Plant's TCR rose 4.0 from 6.9 in 2021 to 10.9 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 0.41× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325510 · Chicago, IL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.9 · 269% of ind

  • DART 3.6 DART
  • RANK #56/59
  • PHOTO Architectural & Indu…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Architectural & Industrial Metal Finishing Co., LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

USA IL Chicago Exchange Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows USA IL Chicago Exchange Plant averages 8.9 TCR (269% of the Industrial product finishes and coatings (i.e., paint) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

USA IL Chicago Exchange Plant TCR series: 2021=6.9 · 2022=10.9 · BLS 3.3

Where USA IL Chicago Exchange Plant falls in its industry

530 Industrial product finishes an establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #56 safest of 59 Industrial product finishes an employers in Illinois.

USA IL Chicago Exchange Plant (33 employees, TCR 8.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate USA IL Chicago Exchange Plant
USA IL Chicago Exchange Plant (33 employees, TCR 8.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 2.5

USA IL Chicago Exchange Plant has fewer employees than the Industrial product finishes and coatings median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 10.9 3.6 3 0 0
2021 6.9 3.4 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325510 · IL · Chicago

530 Industrial product finishes and coatings (i.e., paint) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 2,934 employers in Chicago, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Architectural & Industrial Metal Finishing Co., LLC 8.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR ChromaScape Kentucky 8.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tabco 9.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR IFS Coatings Ardmore 8.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE PharmaCann Dwight 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Konos 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mendota Farm Shop 208 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE NRG Will County Generating Station 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago Public Schools 49,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago/Corporate 18,831 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Illinois at Chicago 13,092 FTE
CITY-NEAR University Health Service UIC UIC Campus 12,732 FTE
NAT-TCR T134 8.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Country Villa Belmont Heights Healthcare Ctr 8.9 TCR
NAT-TCR CareGivers America LLC Lehighton 8.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 483381-Gal-Bob Lyons Sta 8.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Wheelabrator Lisbon Inc. 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wheelabrator Concord Company, L.P. 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wheelabrator Gloucester Company, L.P. 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Syntec Corporate 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.