Refrigerated Warehouse and Storage · Texas

USCS- Dallas, TX (N. Cockrell Hill)

Dallas, TX · ~212 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
4.3
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

USCS- Dallas, TX (N. Cockrell Hill) runs at 75% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Refrigerated Warehouse and Storage workplace, earning a grade B.

USCS- Dallas, TX (N. Cockrell Hill): 4.3 TCR = 75% of Refrigerated Warehouse and Storage BLS 5.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

USCS- Dallas, TX (N. Cockrell Hill) safety composite

USCS- Dallas, TX (N. Cockrell Hill) scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.1

2016→2021

USCS- Dallas, TX (N. Cockrell Hill) injury rate improved

USCS- Dallas, TX (N. Cockrell Hill)'s TCR fell 2.1 from 5.2 in 2016 to 3.1 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 5.5 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.72× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.2 · 2017=4.9 · 2018=4.5 · 2019=5.5 · 2020=2.9 · 2021=3.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493120 · Dallas, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 4.3 · 75% of ind

  • DART 3.1 DART
  • RANK #39/71
  • PHOTO Omaha Freezer
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 58 inj
  • SIZE ~212 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Omaha Freezer (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

USCS- Dallas, TX (N. Cockrell Hill) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows USCS- Dallas, TX (N. Cockrell Hill) averages 4.3 TCR (75% of the Refrigerated Warehouse and Storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

USCS- Dallas, TX (N. Cockrell Hill) TCR series: 2016=5.2 · 2017=4.9 · 2018=4.5 · 2019=5.5 · 2020=2.9 · 2021=3.1 · BLS 5.8

Where USCS- Dallas, TX (N. Cockrell Hill) falls in its industry

1,039 Refrigerated Warehouse and Sto establishments

Safer than 43% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #39 safest of 71 Refrigerated Warehouse and Sto employers in Texas.

USCS- Dallas, TX (N. Cockrell Hill) (212 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 68 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate USCS- Dallas, TX (N. Cockrell Hill)
USCS- Dallas, TX (N. Cockrell Hill) (212 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 68 employees and a TCR of 3.9

USCS- Dallas, TX (N. Cockrell Hill) has more employees than the Refrigerated Warehouse and Storage median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 3.1 3.1 5 0 0
2020 2.9 2.9 6 0 0
2019 5.5 4.5 11 0 0
2018 4.5 3.8 13 0 0
2017 4.9 4.2 14 0 0
2016 5.2 3.5 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493120 · TX · Dallas

1,039 Refrigerated Warehouse and Storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 2,187 employers in Dallas, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Omaha Freezer 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Zero Mountain Johnson 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cold Storage Solutions I Inc. 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sioux Falls-P 4.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE 2601 LOGAN ST DALLAS TX 212 FTE
STATE-SIZE PCI Utilities, LLC 212 FTE
STATE-SIZE Callan Marine Ltd. 212 FTE
STATE-SIZE Maverick of Texas Construction Inc. 212 FTE
CITY-NEAR AECOM DCS (US Operations) 15,100 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rexel USA, Inc 8,356 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1 CHILDRENS MEDICAL CENTER OF DALLAS 6,147 FTE
CITY-NEAR HDQ - Headquarters 5,764 FTE
NAT-TCR Morris Park Rehabilitation and Nursing Center 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Pembroke 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Rosepine Retirement 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR PWS 4.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Capital Transitional Care 212 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tucson Construction 212 FTE
NAT-SIZE Crawford Company 212 FTE
NAT-SIZE Saginaw - KUKA Assembly and Test Corp. 212 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.