Refrigerated Warehouse and Storage · Nebraska

USCS- Omaha, NE (S. 30th St.)

Omaha, NE · ~32 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
5.0
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

USCS- Omaha, NE (S. 30th St.) runs at 86% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Refrigerated Warehouse and Storage workplace, earning a grade C.

USCS- Omaha, NE (S. 30th St.): 5.0 TCR = 86% of Refrigerated Warehouse and Storage BLS 5.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

USCS- Omaha, NE (S. 30th St.) safety composite

USCS- Omaha, NE (S. 30th St.) scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

USCS- Omaha, NE (S. 30th St.): 3.1 → 10.3 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 12.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.52× in 2023

USCS- Omaha, NE (S. 30th St.)'s TCR rose 7.2 from 3.1 in 2016 to 10.3 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 12.4 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.52× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493120 · Omaha, NE AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 5.0 · 86% of ind

  • DART 2.6 DART
  • RANK #10/19
  • PHOTO Crown Bakeries, Cold…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Crown Bakeries, Cold Storage (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Nebraska employers → · Look up another →

USCS- Omaha, NE (S. 30th St.) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows USCS- Omaha, NE (S. 30th St.) averages 5.0 TCR (86% of the Refrigerated Warehouse and Storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

USCS- Omaha, NE (S. 30th St.) TCR series: 2016=3.1 · 2017=3 · 2018=0 · 2019=3.1 · 2020=12.4 · 2021=3 · 2023=10.3 · BLS 5.8

Where USCS- Omaha, NE (S. 30th St.) falls in its industry

1,039 Refrigerated Warehouse and Sto establishments

Safer than 36% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Nebraska alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 19 Refrigerated Warehouse and Sto employers in Nebraska.

USCS- Omaha, NE (S. 30th St.) (32 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 68 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate USCS- Omaha, NE (S. 30th St.)
USCS- Omaha, NE (S. 30th St.) (32 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 68 employees and a TCR of 3.9

USCS- Omaha, NE (S. 30th St.) has fewer employees than the Refrigerated Warehouse and Storage median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 10.3 2.6 4 0 0
2021 3.0 0.0 1 0 0
2020 12.4 9.3 4 0 0
2019 3.1 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 3.0 3.0 1 0 0
2016 3.1 3.1 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493120 · NE · Omaha

1,039 Refrigerated Warehouse and Storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,594 rated employers in Nebraska with headcount on file · 1,135 employers in Omaha, NE · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Crown Bakeries, Cold Storage 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Americold Sebree, KY 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dreisbach at East 11th 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Americold Logistics LLC: Atlanta Pleasantdale 5.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bluebird Nursery Inc 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Prairieland Dairy 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Midwest Electric Cooperative Corporation 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE BHGNE - Kearney (NE053) 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR Drivers Management LLC/Over the Road Drivers 9,373 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nebraska Medicine 8,728 FTE
CITY-NEAR FUSION MEDICAL STAFFING, LLC 2,874 FTE
CITY-NEAR 61830001 METHODIST HOSPITAL 2,861 FTE
NAT-TCR Kerr Masonry, Inc. 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Four Queens Hotel & Casino 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR RDU 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Carter Manufacturing 5.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Classic Stone LLC 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE HomTex, Inc. - Leoma 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Joe Bandy & Son, Inc. 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Custom Agronomics 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.