Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction · Minnesota

Utility Services Group

Woodbury, MN · ~3,254 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Utility Services Group runs at 77% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction workplace, earning a grade B.

Utility Services Group: 2.1 TCR = 77% of Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Utility Services Group safety composite

Utility Services Group scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 47% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2016→2017

Utility Services Group injury rate improved

Utility Services Group's TCR fell 0.4 from 2.4 in 2016 to 1.9 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 2.4 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0.46× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.4 · 2017=1.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Woodbury, MN AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade B · TCR 2.1 · 77% of ind

  • DART 1.0 DART
  • RANK #14/38
  • PHOTO Fleet_Potelco
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 137 inj
  • SIZE ~3,254 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Fleet_Potelco (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Utility Services Group in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Utility Services Group averages 2.1 TCR (77% of the Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Utility Services Group TCR series: 2016=2.4 · 2017=1.9 · BLS 2.8

Where Utility Services Group falls in its industry

1,605 Utility line (i.e., communicat establishments

Safer than 47% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 38 Utility line (i.e., communicat employers in Minnesota.

Utility Services Group (3,254 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Utility Services Group
Utility Services Group (3,254 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Utility Services Group has more employees than the Utility line (i.e., communication, elect median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 1.9 1.0 62 8 1
2016 2.4 1.3 75 4 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · MN · Woodbury

1,605 Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 151 employers in Woodbury, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Fleet_Potelco 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR K and D Construction Services, Inc 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sacramento, CA Office CS 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR FiberPlus, Inc. 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Blue Cross Blue Shield of Minnesota 3,257 FTE
STATE-SIZE St Mary's Medical Center 3,230 FTE
STATE-SIZE UMMC Hospital Unit J 3,142 FTE
STATE-SIZE United Hospital 3,384 FTE
CITY-NEAR MasTec Utility Services, LLC 4,307 FTE
CITY-NEAR HealthEast -Woodwinds Hospital 1,065 FTE
CITY-NEAR Woodwinds Hospital 903 FTE
CITY-NEAR 9407 - Target.com Woodbury MN TFC 749 FTE
NAT-TCR Marine Drive 2 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR HPF 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Chromalloy Middletown 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Penske : 4340-00 Ford Motor ODC/Laredo, TX 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE PC - Primary Childrens Hospital 3,254 FTE
NAT-SIZE Volvo Trucks NA New River Valley Plant 3,257 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pleasantdale Hub (Gaple) 3,250 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Atlantic Group dba DZ Atlantic 3,248 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.