Construction management, water and sewage treatment plant · Florida

Utility Systems Construction, LLC

Groveland, FL · ~36 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.1
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Utility Systems Construction, LLC runs at 146% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Construction management, water and sewage treatment plant workplace, earning a grade D.

Utility Systems Construction, LLC: 4.1 TCR = 146% of Construction management, water and sewage treatment plant BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Utility Systems Construction, LLC safety composite

Utility Systems Construction, LLC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Utility Systems Construction, LLC: 3.1 → 5.0 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 5.0 TCR · DART/TCR 1.24× in 2023

Utility Systems Construction, LLC's TCR rose 1.9 from 3.1 in 2022 to 5.0 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 1.24× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237110 · Groveland, FL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.1 · 146% of ind

  • DART 5.0 DART
  • RANK #74/121
  • PHOTO Ford Development Corp.
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ford Development Corp. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Utility Systems Construction, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Utility Systems Construction, LLC averages 4.1 TCR (146% of the Construction management, water and sewage treatment plant BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Utility Systems Construction, LLC TCR series: 2022=3.1 · 2023=5 · BLS 2.8

Where Utility Systems Construction, LLC falls in its industry

1,614 Construction management, water establishments

Safer than 35% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #74 safest of 121 Construction management, water employers in Florida.

Utility Systems Construction, LLC (36 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Utility Systems Construction, LLC
Utility Systems Construction, LLC (36 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Utility Systems Construction, LLC has fewer employees than the Construction management, water and sewag median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 5.0 5.0 2 0 0
2022 3.1 3.1 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237110 · FL · Groveland

1,614 Construction management, water and sewage treatment plant employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 48 employers in Groveland, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ford Development Corp. 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Precision Engineering and Contracting 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Santa Clara Office 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Benchmark Construction 4.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Scott Citrus Management, Inc. 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Columbia Care Florida LLC.-Alachua 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cal-Maine Foods Lake Wales Florida 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE FM4 Gladiolus Service Center 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR 540-FC003 741 FTE
CITY-NEAR Carroll Fulmer Logistics 351 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cherrylake Main Office 344 FTE
CITY-NEAR Quietflex Manufacturing Company, L.P.- Groveland Florida 233 FTE
NAT-TCR LMA/LCS Willingboro-1113 Hospital Drive 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Gibbs Wire and Steel Company, LLC - South Bend, IN 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #4357 GRAND JUNCTION, CO 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR United Interior Service, Inc 4.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Brush Industries, Inc. 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Homewood Suites (LaQuinta CA) 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hilton Garden Inn Roanoke 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE EDINBURG 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.