Automobile dealers, used only · Missouri

UTS of the Ozarks, Inc. DBA Ozark Utility

Springfield, MO · ~24 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.9
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

UTS of the Ozarks, Inc. DBA Ozark Utility runs at 232% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Automobile dealers, used only workplace, earning a grade F.

UTS of the Ozarks, Inc. DBA Ozark Utility: 7.9 TCR = 232% of Automobile dealers, used only BLS 3.4 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

UTS of the Ozarks, Inc. DBA Ozark Utility safety composite

UTS of the Ozarks, Inc. DBA Ozark Utility scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

UTS of the Ozarks, Inc. DBA Ozark Utility: 7.6 → 8.0 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 8.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.51× in 2019

UTS of the Ozarks, Inc. DBA Ozark Utility's TCR rose 0.4 from 7.6 in 2016 to 8.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 8.0 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.51× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 441120 · Springfield, MO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.9 · 232% of ind

  • DART 4.0 DART
  • RANK #3/4
  • PHOTO JD Byrider Appleton
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~24 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: JD Byrider Appleton (0.3 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

UTS of the Ozarks, Inc. DBA Ozark Utility in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows UTS of the Ozarks, Inc. DBA Ozark Utility averages 7.9 TCR (232% of the Automobile dealers, used only BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

UTS of the Ozarks, Inc. DBA Ozark Utility TCR series: 2016=7.6 · 2018=8 · 2019=8 · BLS 3.4

Where UTS of the Ozarks, Inc. DBA Ozark Utility falls in its industry

76 Automobile dealers, used only establishments

Safer than 24% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 4 Automobile dealers, used only employers in Missouri.

UTS of the Ozarks, Inc. DBA Ozark Utility (24 employees, TCR 7.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 115 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate UTS of the Ozarks, Inc. DBA Ozark Utility
UTS of the Ozarks, Inc. DBA Ozark Utility (24 employees, TCR 7.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 115 employees and a TCR of 5.2

UTS of the Ozarks, Inc. DBA Ozark Utility has fewer employees than the Automobile dealers, used only median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 8.0 4.0 2 0 0
2018 8.0 0.0 2 0 0
2016 7.6 7.6 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

441120 · MO · Springfield

76 Automobile dealers, used only employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 633 employers in Springfield, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR JD Byrider Appleton 8.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Del-Val International Trucks, Inc. 8.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR GRBR 56RR/R1 8.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Carvana Rocklin 8.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Vanduser Gin Co Inc 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Service and Supply Cooperative, Bellflower MO 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN MISSOURI - Osage Plant 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dogwood Energy Facility 24 FTE
CITY-NEAR MERCY HOSPITAL SPRINGFIELD 4,885 FTE
CITY-NEAR Prime, Inc. HQ 3,091 FTE
CITY-NEAR Corp 3,052 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bass Pro Corporate 1,888 FTE
NAT-TCR MTS Coldwater 7.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Coarc-Second Street 7.9 TCR
NAT-TCR The Waters of Princeton 7.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Rangen Inc 7.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Worly Plumbing Supply, Inc. - Cincinnati 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Orton's Equipment Company, Inc. 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE American Awning Co.Inc. 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Martin Sheet Metal / Martin Cab 24 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.