Engineering research and development laboratories or services · California

Vacuum Process Engineering, Inc.

Sacramento, CA · ~99 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
3.6
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Vacuum Process Engineering, Inc. runs at 712% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Engineering research and development laboratories or services workplace, earning a grade F.

Vacuum Process Engineering, Inc.: 3.6 TCR = 712% of Engineering research and development laboratories or services BLS 0.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Vacuum Process Engineering, Inc. safety composite

Vacuum Process Engineering, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

17/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Vacuum Process Engineering, Inc.: 1.7 → 5.4 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 5.4 TCR · DART/TCR 1.27× in 2024

Vacuum Process Engineering, Inc.'s TCR rose 3.8 from 1.7 in 2018 to 5.4 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.27× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541712 · Sacramento, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 3.6 · 712% of ind

  • DART 4.5 DART
  • RANK #32/32
  • PHOTO Houston Methodist In…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~99 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Houston Methodist Institute for Academic Medicine (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Vacuum Process Engineering, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Vacuum Process Engineering, Inc. averages 3.6 TCR (712% of the Engineering research and development laboratories or services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Vacuum Process Engineering, Inc. TCR series: 2018=1.7 · 2019=3.9 · 2023=3.3 · 2024=5.4 · BLS 0.5

Where Vacuum Process Engineering, Inc. falls in its industry

319 Engineering research and devel establishments

Safer than 7% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #32 safest of 32 Engineering research and devel employers in California.

Vacuum Process Engineering, Inc. (99 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 159 employees and a TCR of 0.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Vacuum Process Engineering, Inc.
Vacuum Process Engineering, Inc. (99 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 159 employees and a TCR of 0.8

Vacuum Process Engineering, Inc. has fewer employees than the Engineering research and development lab median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.4 4.5 6 0 0
2023 3.3 0.8 4 0 0
2019 3.9 0.0 3 0 0
2018 1.7 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541712 · CA · Sacramento

319 Engineering research and development laboratories or services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,348 employers in Sacramento, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Houston Methodist Institute for Academic Medicine 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR ActivMed Practices & Research, LLC 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR MycoWorks, 64th 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR UHM/CTAHR/ADAP-PADO 3.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE MARIA ELENA RUIZ MORALES 99 FTE
STATE-SIZE La Verne Nursery, Inc. 99 FTE
STATE-SIZE California Sun Grower Services - North 99 FTE
STATE-SIZE Santa Paula Plant #3 99 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Davis Health 10,481 FTE
CITY-NEAR Employment Development Department 8,494 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 451 5,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 485 5,500 FTE
NAT-TCR A. L. Schutzman 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 731 Festus 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Fletcher-Reinhardt Company 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Rich Products Niles 3.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mapleton Community Home 99 FTE
NAT-SIZE Txpor - Port Arthur 99 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tncle - Cleveland 99 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ohwim - Wilmington 99 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.