Bottle caps and tops, metal, stamping · Massachusetts

Valentine Tool & Stamping, Inc.

Norton, MA · ~21 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Valentine Tool & Stamping, Inc. runs at 164% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Bottle caps and tops, metal, stamping workplace, earning a grade D.

Valentine Tool & Stamping, Inc.: 5.4 TCR = 164% of Bottle caps and tops, metal, stamping BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Valentine Tool & Stamping, Inc. safety composite

Valentine Tool & Stamping, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 46%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−16.3

2017→2019

Valentine Tool & Stamping, Inc. injury rate improved

Valentine Tool & Stamping, Inc.'s TCR fell 16.3 from 16.3 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 16.3 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=16.3 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332119 · Norton, MA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.4 · 164% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/9
  • PHOTO Phoenix Stamping Gro…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~21 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Phoenix Stamping Group PLT01 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Valentine Tool & Stamping, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Valentine Tool & Stamping, Inc. averages 5.4 TCR (164% of the Bottle caps and tops, metal, stamping BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Valentine Tool & Stamping, Inc. TCR series: 2017=16.3 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Valentine Tool & Stamping, Inc. falls in its industry

477 Bottle caps and tops, metal, s establishments

Safer than 46% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 9 Bottle caps and tops, metal, s employers in Massachusetts.

Valentine Tool & Stamping, Inc. (21 employees, TCR 5.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Valentine Tool & Stamping, Inc.
Valentine Tool & Stamping, Inc. (21 employees, TCR 5.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 5.1

Valentine Tool & Stamping, Inc. has fewer employees than the Bottle caps and tops, metal, stamping median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 16.3 16.3 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332119 · MA · Norton

477 Bottle caps and tops, metal, stamping employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 33 employers in Norton, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Phoenix Stamping Group PLT01 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kickhaefer Manufacturing Co - Park Street 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mansfield Industries Inc. 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rockford Toolcraft - Plant 2 5.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bellingham Energy 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE West Medway 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE West Medway Power Plant 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Allendale Biomass LLC 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR Horizon Beverage Company, Inc. 520 FTE
CITY-NEAR AI Distribution Center 263 FTE
CITY-NEAR New England Ice Cream Corporation 186 FTE
CITY-NEAR S09205 - Norton Hauling 181 FTE
NAT-TCR Power Tools : MFG-Madison Heights, MI-USA 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Pipestone Veterinary Clinic of Iowa 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Brandywine Hall 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Brynwood Health and Rehabilitation Center 5.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Big Lots Store #524 ORLANDO, FL 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Valu Home Center #43 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Big Lots Store #4576 Machesney Park, 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Big Lots Store #278 FRANKFORT, KY 21 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.