Signs and signboards (except paper, paperboard) manufacturing · Michigan

Valley City Sign Company

Comstock Park, MI · ~49 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Valley City Sign Company runs at 93% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Signs and signboards (except paper, paperboard) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Valley City Sign Company: 3.1 TCR = 93% of Signs and signboards (except paper, paperboard) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Valley City Sign Company safety composite

Valley City Sign Company scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 57% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 37%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Valley City Sign Company: 0.0 → 2.2 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 9.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.72× in 2024

Valley City Sign Company's TCR rose 2.2 from 0.0 in 2017 to 2.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 9.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.72× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 339950 · Comstock Park, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.1 · 93% of ind

  • DART 2.2 DART
  • RANK #7/13
  • PHOTO Sign Fab, Inc
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~49 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sign Fab, Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Valley City Sign Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Valley City Sign Company averages 3.1 TCR (93% of the Signs and signboards (except paper, paperboard) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Valley City Sign Company TCR series: 2017=0 · 2020=5 · 2021=9.1 · 2022=2 · 2023=0 · 2024=2.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Valley City Sign Company falls in its industry

405 Signs and signboards (except p establishments

Safer than 57% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 13 Signs and signboards (except p employers in Michigan.

Valley City Sign Company (49 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Valley City Sign Company
Valley City Sign Company (49 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Valley City Sign Company has fewer employees than the Signs and signboards (except paper, pape median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.2 2.2 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 2.0 2.0 1 0 0
2021 9.1 9.1 5 0 0
2020 5.0 1.7 3 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

339950 · MI · Comstock Park

405 Signs and signboards (except paper, paperboard) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 61 employers in Comstock Park, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sign Fab, Inc 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR NHM, Inc 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Creo Industrial Arts, LLC 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lewis 3.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE 1003 Canal St 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Miller-Davis Company 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gundlach Champion, Inc. 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE CLOSNER CONSTRUCTION & SALES INC 49 FTE
CITY-NEAR NBHX Trim USA 369 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1923 356 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1923 334 FTE
CITY-NEAR Perrin, Inc. 332 FTE
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Northgate School District 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR York County Government 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Holiday Inn Express New Martinsville WV 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Vibrant Technologies, Inc. 3.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE S07392 - Waste Management of CO Energy Services 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE S09636 - CWM Lake Charles Transportation 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE S05136 - Atlantic Waste Disposal 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Arizona Western Main Fee 49 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.