Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) · Arizona

Valleywide Logistics

Phoenix, AZ · ~52 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
5.7
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Valleywide Logistics runs at 88% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) workplace, earning a grade C.

Valleywide Logistics: 5.7 TCR = 88% of Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS 6.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Valleywide Logistics safety composite

Valleywide Logistics scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 5.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

DART rate
D 5.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Valleywide Logistics: 0.0 → 11.4 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 11.4 TCR · DART/TCR 1× in 2020

Valleywide Logistics's TCR rose 11.4 from 0.0 in 2019 to 11.4 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · Phoenix, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 5.7 · 88% of ind

  • DART 5.7 DART
  • RANK #37/130
  • PHOTO WIDOD - DODGEVILLE
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~52 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: WIDOD - DODGEVILLE (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Valleywide Logistics in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Valleywide Logistics averages 5.7 TCR (88% of the Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Valleywide Logistics TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=11.4 · BLS 6.5

Where Valleywide Logistics falls in its industry

6,679 Courier services (i.e., interc establishments

Safer than 71% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #37 safest of 130 Courier services (i.e., interc employers in Arizona.

Valleywide Logistics (52 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Valleywide Logistics
Valleywide Logistics (52 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

Valleywide Logistics has fewer employees than the Courier services (i.e., intercity networ median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 11.4 5.7 5 1 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · AZ · Phoenix

6,679 Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 2,630 employers in Phoenix, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR WIDOD - DODGEVILLE 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Medical Couriers, Inc. 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR ARFOS - FT. SMITH 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR HIGHLAND HEIGHTS HUB (OHHHT) 5.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE 7892_18700 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE EPCOR Sun City Water, EPCOR Sun City West Water, EPCOR Sun City West Wastewater 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE 5921040 - Intel Campus 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE A1 DESERT ELECTRIC CO. 52 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maricopa County 15,504 FTE
CITY-NEAR Phoenix Children's Hospital 7,575 FTE
CITY-NEAR All Company 6,261 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030500 6,153 FTE
NAT-TCR Dragon Products Los Fresnos 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Ross store 719 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR BT Moberly-Urbandale 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR S05726 - HSS Recycling 5.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Turner at Syngenta Crop Protection Inc. Omaha NE 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE American Girl Houston 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE DGS Aviation Services : SBN - South Bend 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Langdon Place of Exeter 52 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.