Home centers, building materials · New York

Valu Home Center #38

Lancaster, NY · ~31 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.8
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Valu Home Center #38 runs at 407% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Home centers, building materials workplace, earning a grade F.

Valu Home Center #38: 13.8 TCR = 407% of Home centers, building materials BLS 3.4 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Valu Home Center #38 safety composite

Valu Home Center #38 scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 95% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Valu Home Center #38 held a steady TCR band

Valu Home Center #38's TCR held near 0.1 from 19.8 in 2016 to 19.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 22.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=19.8 · 2017=20.9 · 2018=21.4 · 2019=14.4 · 2020=22.6 · 2021=5.5 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=19.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 444110 · Lancaster, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 13.8 · 407% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #317/320
  • PHOTO Dennis
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Dennis (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Valu Home Center #38 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Valu Home Center #38 averages 13.8 TCR (407% of the Home centers, building materials BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Valu Home Center #38 TCR series: 2016=19.8 · 2017=20.9 · 2018=21.4 · 2019=14.4 · 2020=22.6 · 2021=5.5 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=19.9 · BLS 3.4

Where Valu Home Center #38 falls in its industry

6,309 Home centers, building materia establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #317 safest of 320 Home centers, building materia employers in New York.

Valu Home Center #38 (31 employees, TCR 13.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Valu Home Center #38
Valu Home Center #38 (31 employees, TCR 13.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Valu Home Center #38 has fewer employees than the Home centers, building materials median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 19.9 0.0 3 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 5.5 5.5 1 0 0
2020 22.6 16.9 4 0 0
2019 14.4 7.2 2 0 0
2018 21.4 21.4 3 0 0
2017 20.9 13.9 3 0 0
2016 19.8 6.6 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

444110 · NY · Lancaster

6,309 Home centers, building materials employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 83 employers in Lancaster, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Dennis 13.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR EAU CLAIRE WEST WI - 3011 13.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Miller's Truss Plant La Grande 13.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Grafton 13.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Eldred Brothers / Main Farm 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fox Fruit Farms LLC 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE ASC Kirkwood 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE NAES : OM - New Athens 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon Transportation Services : BUF5 1,188 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - BUF5 1,074 FTE
CITY-NEAR Erie Logistics 713 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - BUF9 665 FTE
NAT-TCR Oregon State Hospital-Junction City Campus 13.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Mountain City 13.8 TCR
NAT-TCR The Lakes of Monclova 13.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Casella Recycling - Lewiston 13.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cryogenic Construction Inc 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Iron County Road Commission 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE USA TN Memphis Plant 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Villa Rica Csb (4) 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.