Individual and family social services, multi-purpose · Michigan

Van Buren/Cass District Health Department

Hartford, MI · ~86 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Van Buren/Cass District Health Department runs at 19% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Individual and family social services, multi-purpose workplace, earning a grade A.

Van Buren/Cass District Health Department: 0.7 TCR = 19% of Individual and family social services, multi-purpose BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Van Buren/Cass District Health Department safety composite

Van Buren/Cass District Health Department scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.2

2016→2019

Van Buren/Cass District Health Department injury rate improved

Van Buren/Cass District Health Department's TCR fell 2.2 from 2.2 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 2.2 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.2 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624190 · Hartford, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 19% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/28
  • PHOTO North Central Sight …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~86 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: North Central Sight Services, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Van Buren/Cass District Health Department in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Van Buren/Cass District Health Department averages 0.7 TCR (19% of the Individual and family social services, multi-purpose BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Van Buren/Cass District Health Department TCR series: 2016=2.2 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Van Buren/Cass District Health Department falls in its industry

990 Individual and family social s establishments

Safer than 92% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 28 Individual and family social s employers in Michigan.

Van Buren/Cass District Health Department (86 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Van Buren/Cass District Health Department
Van Buren/Cass District Health Department (86 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Van Buren/Cass District Health Department has more employees than the Individual and family social services, m median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 2.2 2.2 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624190 · MI · Hartford

990 Individual and family social services, multi-purpose employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 6 employers in Hartford, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR North Central Sight Services, Inc. 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Planned Parenthood of Greater NY- Hempstead Health Center 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Intrepid Puerto Rico 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Administration 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Rite-Way Plumbing & Heating Inc 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE Great Lakes Mechanical 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nationwide Construction Group 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wendricks Truss Inc 86 FTE
CITY-NEAR Burnette Foods, Hartford 176 FTE
CITY-NEAR Henkels & McCoy - Hartford, MI 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mann Metal Finishing, Inc. 40 FTE
CITY-NEAR Human Services Building-West 36 FTE
NAT-TCR Time Release Sciences Inc. 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Palatka Medical 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Safbon U.S. Headquarters 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR TX-HOU 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE MUM Industries 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE Delta Power Company 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE NGC - Mount Holly Plant 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bell Plumbing and Heating Company 86 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.