Residential construction, single-family, general contractors · Colorado

Vanguard Homes

Colorado Springs, CO · ~21 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Vanguard Homes runs at 16% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Residential construction, single-family, general contractors workplace, earning a grade A.

Vanguard Homes: 0.6 TCR = 16% of Residential construction, single-family, general contractors BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Vanguard Homes safety composite

Vanguard Homes scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5000.0

2017→2024

Vanguard Homes injury rate improved

Vanguard Homes's TCR fell 5000.0 from 5000.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 5000.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=5000.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=3.7 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236115 · Colorado Springs, CO AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 16% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/42
  • PHOTO Stock Construction
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~21 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Stock Construction (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

Vanguard Homes in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Vanguard Homes averages 0.6 TCR (16% of the Residential construction, single-family, general contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Vanguard Homes TCR series: 2017=5000 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=3.7 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Vanguard Homes falls in its industry

976 Residential construction, sing establishments

Safer than 92% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 42 Residential construction, sing employers in Colorado.

Vanguard Homes (21 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Vanguard Homes
Vanguard Homes (21 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Vanguard Homes has fewer employees than the Residential construction, single-family, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 3.7 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 5000.0 5000.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236115 · CO · Colorado Springs

976 Residential construction, single-family, general contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 832 employers in Colorado Springs, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Stock Construction 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR HBT Construction of Arizona, Inc. 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR MZ-Russell, Inc 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ravenwood 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sacred Seed 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE NGL WATER SOLUTIONS, LLC-C3 LASALLE 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE WGW Golden West Wind 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE BHE - Canon City Utility Dr (CO008) 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Colorado Hospital Memorial Central 3,102 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - DEN4 2,948 FTE
CITY-NEAR Penrose Hospital 2,841 FTE
CITY-NEAR 05070001-050701 PENROSE HOSPITAL 2,391 FTE
NAT-TCR Old Dominion Abatement and Demolition, LLC - VA 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Nautilus Hyosung America - Global Security Center 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR ASU Mill Avenue Garage 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Kent Displays, Incorporated 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE ryder 0416 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tiff's Treats - LBK1 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE MMA Aero 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tiff's Treats - H13 21 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.