Anesthesia apparatus manufacturing · New Hampshire

Vapotherm 100 Domain Drive

Exeter, NH · ~301 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Vapotherm 100 Domain Drive runs at 49% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Anesthesia apparatus manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Vapotherm 100 Domain Drive: 1.6 TCR = 49% of Anesthesia apparatus manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Vapotherm 100 Domain Drive safety composite

Vapotherm 100 Domain Drive scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 47%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.8

2017→2024

Vapotherm 100 Domain Drive injury rate improved

Vapotherm 100 Domain Drive's TCR fell 1.8 from 1.8 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 4.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=1.8 · 2018=1.3 · 2019=1.3 · 2020=4.5 · 2021=0.7 · 2022=3.3 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 339112 · Exeter, NH AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.6 · 49% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/12
  • PHOTO Mark Anderson & Asso…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~301 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Mark Anderson & Associates, Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Hampshire employers → · Look up another →

Vapotherm 100 Domain Drive in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Vapotherm 100 Domain Drive averages 1.6 TCR (49% of the Anesthesia apparatus manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Vapotherm 100 Domain Drive TCR series: 2017=1.8 · 2018=1.3 · 2019=1.3 · 2020=4.5 · 2021=0.7 · 2022=3.3 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Vapotherm 100 Domain Drive falls in its industry

741 Anesthesia apparatus manufactu establishments

Safer than 47% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Hampshire alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 12 Anesthesia apparatus manufactu employers in New Hampshire.

Vapotherm 100 Domain Drive (301 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 174 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,000 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate Vapotherm 100 Domain Drive
Vapotherm 100 Domain Drive (301 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 174 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Vapotherm 100 Domain Drive has more employees than the Anesthesia apparatus manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 3.3 2.6 0 10 0
2021 0.7 0.7 1 2 0
2020 4.5 4.5 6 14 0
2019 1.3 1.0 4 0 0
2018 1.3 0.7 4 0 0
2017 1.8 0.4 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

339112 · NH · Exeter

741 Anesthesia apparatus manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,718 rated employers in New Hampshire with headcount on file · 33 employers in Exeter, NH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Mark Anderson & Associates, Inc 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR ICU Medical Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR BD Canaan 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Custom Wire Technologies 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Portsmouth Manufacturing Facility 300 FTE
STATE-SIZE Market Basket #35 300 FTE
STATE-SIZE Market Basket #81 300 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 1975 298 FTE
CITY-NEAR Exeter Hospital 1,530 FTE
CITY-NEAR Core Physicians 645 FTE
CITY-NEAR RiverWoods Exeter 464 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sig Sauer Inc. - Exeter 460 FTE
NAT-TCR City of Royal Oak - City Hall 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Litchfield 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR City Hall 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR S05136 - Atlantic Waste Disposal 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Distribution Group 301 FTE
NAT-SIZE Patterson Pump Company 301 FTE
NAT-SIZE CertainTeed Corporation Williamsport Maryland 301 FTE
NAT-SIZE AECI Electric Utility Sales and Services 301 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.