X-ray apparatus and tubes (e.g., control, industrial, medical, research) manufacturing · California

Varex Imaging, Santa Clara

Santa Clara, CA · ~146 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Varex Imaging, Santa Clara runs at 26% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical X-ray apparatus and tubes (e.g., control, industrial, medical, research) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Varex Imaging, Santa Clara: 0.9 TCR = 26% of X-ray apparatus and tubes (e.g., control, industrial, medical, research) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Varex Imaging, Santa Clara safety composite

Varex Imaging, Santa Clara scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.5

2017→2022

Varex Imaging, Santa Clara injury rate improved

Varex Imaging, Santa Clara's TCR fell 3.5 from 3.5 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2017 at 3.5 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.5 · 2018=1.7 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334517 · Santa Clara, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 26% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/9
  • PHOTO Varex Imaging, Illin…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~146 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Varex Imaging, Illinois (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Varex Imaging, Santa Clara in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Varex Imaging, Santa Clara averages 0.9 TCR (26% of the X-ray apparatus and tubes (e.g., control, industrial, medical, research) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Varex Imaging, Santa Clara TCR series: 2017=3.5 · 2018=1.7 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Varex Imaging, Santa Clara falls in its industry

60 X-ray apparatus and tubes (e.g establishments

Safer than 63% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 9 X-ray apparatus and tubes (e.g employers in California.

Varex Imaging, Santa Clara (146 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate Varex Imaging, Santa Clara
Varex Imaging, Santa Clara (146 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.2

Varex Imaging, Santa Clara has more employees than the X-ray apparatus and tubes (e.g., control median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 1.7 0.6 3 0 0
2017 3.5 2.4 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334517 · CA · Santa Clara

60 X-ray apparatus and tubes (e.g., control, industrial, medical, research) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 332 employers in Santa Clara, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Varex Imaging, Illinois 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Varian, Palo Alto 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR VJE MA 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Medtronic Navigation Littleton 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE CG - 001 146 FTE
STATE-SIZE Leon Farms Inc 146 FTE
STATE-SIZE TES/GEOSCIENCES 146 FTE
STATE-SIZE Arrow Construction 146 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mission Campus 6,222 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pure Storage 5,595 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2032-02120751 3,887 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0206-02620751 3,154 FTE
NAT-TCR Bottom Line Equipment, St Rose 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Food City Support Center 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Horn Tire Inc 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 1012 - Owensboro 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Rochelle 146 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brookdale Leawood State Line 146 FTE
NAT-SIZE JKN-ODFL 146 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ferriot Inc. 146 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.