Viscosimeters, industrial process-type, manufacturing · Ohio

VEGA Americas, Inc

Cincinnati, OH · ~295 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

VEGA Americas, Inc runs at 17% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Viscosimeters, industrial process-type, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

VEGA Americas, Inc: 0.6 TCR = 17% of Viscosimeters, industrial process-type, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

VEGA Americas, Inc safety composite

VEGA Americas, Inc scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 47%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

VEGA Americas, Inc held a steady TCR band

VEGA Americas, Inc's TCR held near 0.3 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.3 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 1.6 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.55× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.4 · 2018=1.6 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=1.0 · 2021=0.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334513 · Cincinnati, OH AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 17% of ind

  • DART 0.3 DART
  • RANK #4/18
  • PHOTO Yokogawa Corporation…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~295 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Yokogawa Corporation of America (Newnan) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

VEGA Americas, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows VEGA Americas, Inc averages 0.6 TCR (17% of the Viscosimeters, industrial process-type, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

VEGA Americas, Inc TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0.4 · 2018=1.6 · 2019=0 · 2020=1 · 2021=0.3 · BLS 3.3

Where VEGA Americas, Inc falls in its industry

322 Viscosimeters, industrial proc establishments

Safer than 85% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 18 Viscosimeters, industrial proc employers in Ohio.

VEGA Americas, Inc (295 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 96 employees and a TCR of 1.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate VEGA Americas, Inc
VEGA Americas, Inc (295 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 96 employees and a TCR of 1.3

VEGA Americas, Inc has more employees than the Viscosimeters, industrial process-type, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.3 0.3 1 0 0
2020 1.0 0.7 3 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 1.6 1.2 4 0 0
2017 0.4 0.4 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334513 · OH · Cincinnati

322 Viscosimeters, industrial process-type, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 1,513 employers in Cincinnati, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Yokogawa Corporation of America (Newnan) 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR HORIBA Instruments Incorporated 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR KVB Enertec 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Coperion Ktron (CKPA) - Pitman 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE The Shelly Company - NE Division Construction and Operations 295 FTE
STATE-SIZE Youngstown - GLI 295 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pittsburgh Glass Works, LLC 295 FTE
STATE-SIZE 10D8163 PHARMA JEFFERSONVILLE OH 295 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center 17,011 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cincinnati Operations 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain : Evendale, OH 7,118 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain Evendale OH 6,400 FTE
NAT-TCR Cambria Hotel & Suites 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR McDowell Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Kemira Chemicals - Marietta Plant 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR NAES : Altavista 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hino Motors - South 295 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shoprite of Waretown 295 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0364 - West Bayamon Pr Whse 295 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stanley Access Technologies Farmington 295 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.