All other automotive repair and maintenance · Michigan

Vehicle Service Center

Dearborn, MI · ~81 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.8
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Vehicle Service Center runs at 372% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical All other automotive repair and maintenance workplace, earning a grade F.

Vehicle Service Center: 7.8 TCR = 372% of All other automotive repair and maintenance BLS 2.1 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Vehicle Service Center safety composite

Vehicle Service Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 54% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.8

2016→2024

Vehicle Service Center injury rate improved

Vehicle Service Center's TCR fell 2.8 from 6.3 in 2016 to 3.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 11.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.45× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.3 · 2017=10.8 · 2018=9.5 · 2019=11.0 · 2020=5.8 · 2021=3.5 · 2022=11.9 · 2023=8.1 · 2024=3.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811198 · Dearborn, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.8 · 372% of ind

  • DART 3.5 DART
  • RANK #16/21
  • PHOTO Ronkonkoma
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 49 inj
  • SIZE ~81 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ronkonkoma (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Vehicle Service Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Vehicle Service Center averages 7.8 TCR (372% of the All other automotive repair and maintenance BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Vehicle Service Center TCR series: 2016=6.3 · 2017=10.8 · 2018=9.5 · 2019=11 · 2020=5.8 · 2021=3.5 · 2022=11.9 · 2023=8.1 · 2024=3.5 · BLS 2.1

Where Vehicle Service Center falls in its industry

66 All other automotive repair an establishments

Safer than 24% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 21 All other automotive repair an employers in Michigan.

Vehicle Service Center (81 employees, TCR 7.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 95 employees and a TCR of 6.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Vehicle Service Center
Vehicle Service Center (81 employees, TCR 7.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 95 employees and a TCR of 6.0

Vehicle Service Center has fewer employees than the All other automotive repair and maintena median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.5 3.5 3 0 0
2023 8.1 6.9 7 0 0
2022 11.9 9.5 8 2 0
2021 3.5 2.4 3 0 0
2020 5.8 4.3 3 1 0
2019 11.0 9.8 9 0 0
2018 9.5 5.4 5 2 0
2017 10.8 10.8 7 0 0
2016 6.3 1.6 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811198 · MI · Dearborn

66 All other automotive repair and maintenance employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 130 employers in Dearborn, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ronkonkoma 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR STTC Bethlehem 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR STTC Arbutus 7.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ground Effects, LLC - Rotunda 8.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pioneer HI-BRED INTL INC, Constantine MI 81 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gas Construction Flint 81 FTE
STATE-SIZE Detroit International Holding 81 FTE
STATE-SIZE TCCo-MI 81 FTE
CITY-NEAR PDC - PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT CENTER TRUCK 20,749 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dearborn Truck Plant 5,037 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2250-1 4,185 FTE
CITY-NEAR PDC - PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT CENTER DESIGN 3,940 FTE
NAT-TCR XQC 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Power Systems Division - West 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR De Ruijter International USA, Inc. 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Westwind Concrete 7.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE ACCO Brands - Ogdensburg 81 FTE
NAT-SIZE Middleton 81 FTE
NAT-SIZE Coyote Station 81 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ottumwa Generating Station 81 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.