Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial warehouse · Ohio

Verst Pop Dock

Cincinnati, OH · ~21 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Verst Pop Dock runs at 29% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial warehouse workplace, earning a grade A.

Verst Pop Dock: 0.8 TCR = 29% of Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial warehouse BLS 2.9 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Verst Pop Dock safety composite

Verst Pop Dock scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.8

2016→2024

Verst Pop Dock injury rate improved

Verst Pop Dock's TCR fell 5.8 from 5.8 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 5.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.8 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Cincinnati, OH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 29% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #28/220
  • PHOTO EDGERTON TRUCKING, I…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~21 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: EDGERTON TRUCKING, INC. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Verst Pop Dock in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Verst Pop Dock averages 0.8 TCR (29% of the Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial warehouse BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Verst Pop Dock TCR series: 2016=5.8 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.9

Where Verst Pop Dock falls in its industry

4,692 Addition, alteration and renov establishments

Safer than 82% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #28 safest of 220 Addition, alteration and renov employers in Ohio.

Verst Pop Dock (21 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Verst Pop Dock
Verst Pop Dock (21 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Verst Pop Dock has fewer employees than the Addition, alteration and renovation for- median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 5.8 5.8 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · OH · Cincinnati

4,692 Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial warehouse employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 1,513 employers in Cincinnati, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR EDGERTON TRUCKING, INC. 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR LRA Constructors, Inc. 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Management Resource Systems Inc 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dudley Construction, Ltd. 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Grand Republic 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hog and Maintenance 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Case Farms Hatchery 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Case Farms winesburg hatchery 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center 17,011 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cincinnati Operations 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain : Evendale, OH 7,118 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain Evendale OH 6,400 FTE
NAT-TCR Admin Building 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR AOC Tennessee Resins 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Immanuel Courtyard 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Hillsboro Preprint Facility 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Raymond 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brookdale Winter Haven-AL 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Atlas Wholesale Supply 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Silver Beach Club Management 21 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.