Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) · Arizona

Verve Carries LLC

Tucson, AZ · ~56 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
8.3
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Verve Carries LLC runs at 127% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) workplace, earning a grade D.

Verve Carries LLC: 8.3 TCR = 127% of Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Verve Carries LLC safety composite

Verve Carries LLC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

DART rate
B 2.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Verve Carries LLC: 9.1 → 98.1 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 98.1 TCR · DART/TCR 2.26× in 2024

Verve Carries LLC's TCR rose 89.0 from 9.1 in 2022 to 98.1 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 2.26× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · Tucson, AZ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 8.3 · 127% of ind

  • DART 18.7 DART
  • RANK #59/130
  • PHOTO Alpha Logistics LLC
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 31 inj
  • SIZE ~56 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Alpha Logistics LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Verve Carries LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Verve Carries LLC averages 8.3 TCR (127% of the Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Verve Carries LLC TCR series: 2022=9.1 · 2023=7.4 · 2024=98.1 · BLS 6.5

Where Verve Carries LLC falls in its industry

6,679 Courier services (i.e., interc establishments

Safer than 48% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #59 safest of 130 Courier services (i.e., interc employers in Arizona.

Verve Carries LLC (56 employees, TCR 8.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Verve Carries LLC
Verve Carries LLC (56 employees, TCR 8.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

Verve Carries LLC has fewer employees than the Courier services (i.e., intercity networ median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 98.1 18.7 21 0 0
2023 7.4 3.0 5 0 0
2022 9.1 9.1 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · AZ · Tucson

6,679 Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 1,150 employers in Tucson, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Alpha Logistics LLC 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fleet: Portland SDO 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 296210000 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR SAN FERNANDO (CASFR) 8.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Casa Grande Office 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pacific Bath Phoenix 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Premier Building Group Collective 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rowley Plastering LC 56 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Arizona 18,951 FTE
CITY-NEAR Raytheon_Tucson_AZ_Airport Site 9,878 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tucson Medical Center 4,407 FTE
CITY-NEAR U.S. Border Patrol Sector - Tucson 3,989 FTE
NAT-TCR Heritage Bag-Rancho 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Point Mugu 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR El Ahorro Supermarket #11, LLC 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Belmont Village - La Jolla 8.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Camp Hill Flour Mill 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Valdosta Refinery 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mount Vernon Flour Mill 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE AHN Harmar Neighborhood Hospital 56 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.