Foam plastics products (except polystrene) manufacturing · New Hampshire

Vibracoustic North America L.P. - MCU

Manchester, NH · ~131 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Vibracoustic North America L.P. - MCU runs at 209% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Foam plastics products (except polystrene) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Vibracoustic North America L.P. - MCU: 6.9 TCR = 209% of Foam plastics products (except polystrene) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Vibracoustic North America L.P. - MCU safety composite

Vibracoustic North America L.P. - MCU scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

19/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

DART rate
F 12.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Vibracoustic North America L.P. - MCU: 3.0 → 14.2 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 14.2 TCR · DART/TCR 1.8× in 2023

Vibracoustic North America L.P. - MCU's TCR rose 11.2 from 3.0 in 2019 to 14.2 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 1.8× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326150 · Manchester, NH ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 6.9 · 209% of ind

  • DART 12.4 DART
  • RANK #3/4
  • PHOTO Fehrer Automotive SC…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 51 inj
  • SIZE ~131 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Fehrer Automotive SC, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Hampshire employers → · Look up another →

Vibracoustic North America L.P. - MCU in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Vibracoustic North America L.P. - MCU averages 6.9 TCR (209% of the Foam plastics products (except polystrene) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Vibracoustic North America L.P. - MCU TCR series: 2019=3 · 2020=4 · 2021=7.2 · 2022=6.1 · 2023=14.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Vibracoustic North America L.P. - MCU falls in its industry

474 Foam plastics products (except establishments

Safer than 13% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Hampshire alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 4 Foam plastics products (except employers in New Hampshire.

Vibracoustic North America L.P. - MCU (131 employees, TCR 6.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Vibracoustic North America L.P. - MCU
Vibracoustic North America L.P. - MCU (131 employees, TCR 6.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Vibracoustic North America L.P. - MCU has more employees than the Foam plastics products (except polystren median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 14.2 12.4 24 0 0
2022 6.1 4.6 8 0 0
2021 7.2 5.6 9 0 0
2020 4.0 3.2 5 0 0
2019 3.0 1.2 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326150 · NH · Manchester

474 Foam plastics products (except polystrene) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,718 rated employers in New Hampshire with headcount on file · 253 employers in Manchester, NH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Fehrer Automotive SC, LLC 6.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR LPFP- Fort Worth Prime 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lear Corporation - Farwell 6.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR UFP Technologies, Iowa 7.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Chinburg Builders, Inc. 131 FTE
STATE-SIZE HP Hood, LLC- Concord, NH 131 FTE
STATE-SIZE PSI Molded Plastics Inc 131 FTE
STATE-SIZE Turbocam Redemption Rd 131 FTE
CITY-NEAR Point32Health Manchester 4,440 FTE
CITY-NEAR Elliot Hospital 2,745 FTE
CITY-NEAR Catholic Medical Center 2,086 FTE
CITY-NEAR 15966 1,154 FTE
NAT-TCR Richmond Place 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR GF Management 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Fibercel Packaging LLC 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Robinson Nursery, Inc. 6.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE GCS, Inc. 131 FTE
NAT-SIZE Harrison Senior Living 131 FTE
NAT-SIZE Standard Bag Mfg. Company 131 FTE
NAT-SIZE Atlantic Rehabilitation Hospital LLC 131 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.