Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · New Jersey

Victoria Commons

Name: Victoria Commons Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

North Cape May, NJ · ~32 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

F
Failing Safety Record: 15.2
Avg TCR: 3.8
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Victoria Commons runs at 399% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Victoria Commons: 15.2 TCR = 399% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Victoria Commons safety composite

Victoria Commons scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

20/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): F 15.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers
DART rate: F 13.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Victoria Commons: 4.7 → 20.4 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 29.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.9× in 2019

Victoria Commons's TCR rose 15.6 from 4.7 in 2016 to 20.4 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 29.2 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.9× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · North Cape May, NJ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 15.2 · 399% of ind

DART 13.6 DART
RANK #116/125
PHOTO The Moments
BOOK 4y book
INJ 16 inj
SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Moments (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

This site

15.2
The Moments

15.2
Edgewood Sprin

15.2
6273_14734

15.2
10523

15.2

What this shows Victoria Commons averages 15.2 TCR (399% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Victoria Commons TCR series: 2016=4.7 · 2017=6.4 · 2018=29.2 · 2019=20.4 · BLS 3.8

Where Victoria Commons falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

Grade F

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #116 safest of 125 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in New Jersey.

Victoria Commons (32 employees, TCR 15.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Victoria Commons has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses
2019	20.4	13.6	6	0
2018	29.2	18.2	6	2
2017	6.4	6.4	2	0
2016	4.7	2.4	2	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · NJ · North Cape May

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 10 employers in North Cape May, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	The Moments	LAKEVILLE, MN	15.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Edgewood Spring Creek Eagle	EAGLE, ID	15.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR	6273_14734	FREMONT, MI	15.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR	10523	PALM DESERT, CA	15.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE	New Jersey Natural Gas - Atlantic Highlands	ATLANTIC HIGHLANDS	32 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Squan Wireless	CARLSTADT	32 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Tracts unlimited	MOUNTAINSIDE	32 FTE
STATE-SIZE	7326_16863	HAMILTON	32 FTE
CITY-NEAR	5472-000007855	North Cape May	152 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Pelican Pointe	North Cape May	132 FTE
CITY-NEAR	5472-NAI-0034-0034-02855	North Cape May	125 FTE
CITY-NEAR	5472-000002855	North Cape May	125 FTE
NAT-TCR	Main Gentilly	New Orleans, LA	15.2 TCR
NAT-TCR	Lake Tahoe - Resort	Stateline, NV	15.2 TCR
NAT-TCR	WAYNECO	York, PA	15.2 TCR
NAT-TCR	Town of Middlebury	Middlebury, CT	15.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Miner Central Texas	San Antonio, TX	32 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Store 09	Henderson, NV	32 FTE
NAT-SIZE	City of Riverside Public Works Administration, Parking and Traffic	Riverside, CA	32 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Copper and Brass Sales - Bolingbrook	Bolingbrook, IL	32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.