Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) · California

Victoria Healthcare & Rehabilitation

Costa Mesa, CA · ~129 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.4
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Victoria Healthcare & Rehabilitation runs at 52% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) workplace, earning a grade B.

Victoria Healthcare & Rehabilitation: 3.4 TCR = 52% of Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS 6.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Victoria Healthcare & Rehabilitation safety composite

Victoria Healthcare & Rehabilitation scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.9

2017→2023

Victoria Healthcare & Rehabilitation injury rate improved

Victoria Healthcare & Rehabilitation's TCR fell 4.9 from 5.8 in 2017 to 0.9 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 5.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.26× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=5.8 · 2020=4.3 · 2022=2.7 · 2023=0.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Costa Mesa, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 3.4 · 52% of ind

  • DART 0.9 DART
  • RANK #77/739
  • PHOTO Therapy Management C…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~129 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Therapy Management Corporation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Victoria Healthcare & Rehabilitation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Victoria Healthcare & Rehabilitation averages 3.4 TCR (52% of the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Victoria Healthcare & Rehabilitation TCR series: 2017=5.8 · 2020=4.3 · 2022=2.7 · 2023=0.9 · BLS 6.5

Where Victoria Healthcare & Rehabilitation falls in its industry

15,252 Convalescent homes or convales establishments

Safer than 81% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #77 safest of 739 Convalescent homes or convales employers in California.

Victoria Healthcare & Rehabilitation (129 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Victoria Healthcare & Rehabilitation
Victoria Healthcare & Rehabilitation (129 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Victoria Healthcare & Rehabilitation has more employees than the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospi median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.9 0.9 1 0 0
2022 2.7 2.7 3 0 0
2020 4.3 4.3 4 0 0
2017 5.8 0.0 0 5 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · CA · Costa Mesa

15,252 Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 185 employers in Costa Mesa, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Therapy Management Corporation 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rolling Meadows Health and Rehabilitation 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Columbia Rehabilitation & Health @ Nexion 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Maple Lawn Nursing Home 3.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE MIGUEL OLIVARES & SONS 129 FTE
STATE-SIZE SUPERIOR AG. 129 FTE
STATE-SIZE Manco Ag Services 129 FTE
STATE-SIZE LADWP 11791 TRUESDALE 129 FTE
CITY-NEAR PACIFIC AMPHITHEATER 863 FTE
CITY-NEAR OC Fair & Event Center 861 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Costa Mesa 670 FTE
CITY-NEAR PACWEST Security Services 567 FTE
NAT-TCR S03035 - Meadowfill Landfill 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Barre #123 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Hospice El Paso 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Sew-Eurodrive, Inc - Bridgeport Nj 3.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Logan County Health Services 129 FTE
NAT-SIZE Westfall #202 129 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oahu Port of Honolulu, Pier 40 129 FTE
NAT-SIZE Riverdale 129 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.