General warehousing and storage · New Jersey

Victoria's Secret Processing Center - New Jersey

Carlstadt, NJ · ~41 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Victoria's Secret Processing Center - New Jersey runs at 7% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical General warehousing and storage workplace, earning a grade A.

Victoria's Secret Processing Center - New Jersey: 0.4 TCR = 7% of General warehousing and storage BLS 5.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Victoria's Secret Processing Center - New Jersey safety composite

Victoria's Secret Processing Center - New Jersey scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 98% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 98% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Victoria's Secret Processing Center - New Jersey: 0.0 → 1.5 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 1.5 TCR · DART/TCR 3.95× in 2019

Victoria's Secret Processing Center - New Jersey's TCR rose 1.5 from 0.0 in 2016 to 1.5 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 3.95× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Carlstadt, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 7% of ind

  • DART 1.5 DART
  • RANK #11/333
  • PHOTO Hikma Pharmaceutical…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~41 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. - Creekside (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Victoria's Secret Processing Center - New Jersey in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Victoria's Secret Processing Center - New Jersey averages 0.4 TCR (7% of the General warehousing and storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Victoria's Secret Processing Center - New Jersey TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=1.5 · BLS 5.8

Where Victoria's Secret Processing Center - New Jersey falls in its industry

9,477 General warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 98% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 333 General warehousing and storag employers in New Jersey.

Victoria's Secret Processing Center - New Jersey (41 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Victoria's Secret Processing Center - New Jersey
Victoria's Secret Processing Center - New Jersey (41 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Victoria's Secret Processing Center - New Jersey has fewer employees than the General warehousing and storage median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 1.5 1.5 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · NJ · Carlstadt

9,477 General warehousing and storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 78 employers in Carlstadt, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. - Creekside 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR TX - Boeing IDS 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Capacity Midwest LLC 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Warehouse Services, Inc. - Wilmington 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Swimming River Treatment Plant 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Office 60 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE RC Andersen LLC 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mcr office 41 FTE
CITY-NEAR TRIBECA OVEN 362 FTE
CITY-NEAR Safway Atlantic, LLC - New Jersey 303 FTE
CITY-NEAR General Trading Co. Inc. 295 FTE
CITY-NEAR Unimac Graphics, LLC 227 FTE
NAT-TCR TSAM-R 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Livermore Training Center 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Serveron - Beaverton 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Adleta Construction 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Patrick Motors Auburn 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lincoln Lumber Corrigan 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Girard Machine 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Yarde Metals, Inc.: New Hampshire 41 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.