Skilled nursing facilities · California

View Park Convalescent Hospital

Los Angeles, CA · ~157 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
5.2
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

View Park Convalescent Hospital runs at 80% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade C.

View Park Convalescent Hospital: 5.2 TCR = 80% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

View Park Convalescent Hospital safety composite

View Park Convalescent Hospital scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 63% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 5.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−628.4

2017→2024

View Park Convalescent Hospital injury rate improved

View Park Convalescent Hospital's TCR fell 628.4 from 636.4 in 2017 to 8.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 636.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.14× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=636.4 · 2018=11.8 · 2021=0.0 · 2023=1.1 · 2024=8.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Los Angeles, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 5.2 · 80% of ind

  • DART 6.0 DART
  • RANK #173/739
  • PHOTO Hunter's Creek Nursi…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 33 inj
  • SIZE ~157 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hunter's Creek Nursing and Rehab Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

View Park Convalescent Hospital in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows View Park Convalescent Hospital averages 5.2 TCR (80% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

View Park Convalescent Hospital TCR series: 2017=636.4 · 2018=11.8 · 2021=0 · 2023=1.1 · 2024=8 · BLS 6.5

Where View Park Convalescent Hospital falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 63% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #173 safest of 739 Skilled nursing facilities employers in California.

View Park Convalescent Hospital (157 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate View Park Convalescent Hospital
View Park Convalescent Hospital (157 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

View Park Convalescent Hospital has more employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.0 6.0 7 1 0
2023 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 11.8 0.0 11 0 0
2017 636.4 454.6 14 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · CA · Los Angeles

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 2,064 employers in Los Angeles, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hunter's Creek Nursing and Rehab Center 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR JAG Healthcare Marion 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Life Care Center of Michigan City 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Spring Valley Health & Rehabilitation Center 5.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE GloriAnn Farms Tracy 157 FTE
STATE-SIZE LaborTime Inc. 157 FTE
STATE-SIZE FOUR SEASONS PRODUCE PACKING COMPANY, INC. - CA 157 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kairos Power-Alameda 157 FTE
CITY-NEAR Live Nation Worldwide, Inc. 50,317 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Los Angeles 40,333 FTE
CITY-NEAR LADWP 11,717 FTE
CITY-NEAR Los Angeles Department of Water and Power 10,346 FTE
NAT-TCR Parkview Center School 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Strasburg VA 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR West Chicago 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Alco Elyria 5.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE 168-Hyatt Regency Indianapolis 157 FTE
NAT-SIZE ZF Group CVS Hebron 157 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Martin-Brower Company, LLC 157 FTE
NAT-SIZE Minneapolis 138 157 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.