Pipe fabricating (i.e., bending, cutting, threading) made from purchased metal pipe · Texas

Viking Fabrication - Houston

Houston, TX · ~30 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Viking Fabrication - Houston runs at 107% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Pipe fabricating (i.e., bending, cutting, threading) made from purchased metal pipe workplace, earning a grade C.

Viking Fabrication - Houston: 3.5 TCR = 107% of Pipe fabricating (i.e., bending, cutting, threading) made from purchased metal pipe BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Viking Fabrication - Houston safety composite

Viking Fabrication - Houston scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Viking Fabrication - Houston: 3.0 → 7.6 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 7.6 TCR · DART/TCR 1.07× in 2021

Viking Fabrication - Houston's TCR rose 4.6 from 3.0 in 2019 to 7.6 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 1.07× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332996 · Houston, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.5 · 107% of ind

  • DART 3.8 DART
  • RANK #52/73
  • PHOTO LeRoy Plastics Inc.
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: LeRoy Plastics Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Viking Fabrication - Houston in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Viking Fabrication - Houston averages 3.5 TCR (107% of the Pipe fabricating (i.e., bending, cutting, threading) made from purchased metal pipe BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Viking Fabrication - Houston TCR series: 2019=3 · 2020=0 · 2021=7.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Viking Fabrication - Houston falls in its industry

337 Pipe fabricating (i.e., bendin establishments

Safer than 47% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #52 safest of 73 Pipe fabricating (i.e., bendin employers in Texas.

Viking Fabrication - Houston (30 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Viking Fabrication - Houston
Viking Fabrication - Houston (30 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Viking Fabrication - Houston has fewer employees than the Pipe fabricating (i.e., bending, cutting median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 7.6 3.8 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.0 3.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332996 · TX · Houston

337 Pipe fabricating (i.e., bending, cutting, threading) made from purchased metal pipe employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 5,116 employers in Houston, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR LeRoy Plastics Inc. 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Capitol Manufacturing Inc 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR J & D TUBE BENDERS, INC 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR CryoWorks, Inc. 3.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE BRAZOS RIVER SOD FARM 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Coyote Lake Feeders LLC 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dimmitt Feedyard 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Green Plains Cattle Company LLC - Hereford 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH IAH 11,560 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH - Airport United Airlines Offices 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-IAH 9,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Methodist Hospital Texas Medical Center 8,873 FTE
NAT-TCR Crest Foam Corp 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Bemidji Lumbermill 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Blue Cotton, Inc 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Meijer Store #19 3.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ambulance Express Inc. 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Marc Refrigeration Manufacturing Inc. 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE TGH Family Care Center Kennedy 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Elizabeth River Recycling LLC 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.