Continuing care retirement communities · California

Villa Marin Homeowners' Association

San Rafael, CA · ~150 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Villa Marin Homeowners' Association runs at 347% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Continuing care retirement communities workplace, earning a grade F.

Villa Marin Homeowners' Association: 13.2 TCR = 347% of Continuing care retirement communities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Villa Marin Homeowners' Association safety composite

Villa Marin Homeowners' Association scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Villa Marin Homeowners' Association: 3.6 → 11.7 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 36.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.44× in 2023

Villa Marin Homeowners' Association's TCR rose 8.1 from 3.6 in 2017 to 11.7 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 36.1 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.44× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · San Rafael, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 13.2 · 347% of ind

  • DART 5.9 DART
  • RANK #159/216
  • PHOTO Bickford of Springfi…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 34 inj
  • SIZE ~150 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bickford of Springfield (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Villa Marin Homeowners' Association in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Villa Marin Homeowners' Association averages 13.2 TCR (347% of the Continuing care retirement communities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Villa Marin Homeowners' Association TCR series: 2017=3.6 · 2018=7.7 · 2019=36.1 · 2020=10.4 · 2021=13.1 · 2022=9.9 · 2023=11.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Villa Marin Homeowners' Association falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing care retirement com establishments

Safer than 17% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #159 safest of 216 Continuing care retirement com employers in California.

Villa Marin Homeowners' Association (150 employees, TCR 13.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Villa Marin Homeowners' Association
Villa Marin Homeowners' Association (150 employees, TCR 13.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Villa Marin Homeowners' Association has more employees than the Continuing care retirement communities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 11.7 5.9 5 5 0
2022 9.9 5.9 5 5 0
2021 13.1 4.0 4 9 0
2020 10.4 1.7 4 8 0
2019 36.1 17.0 8 9 0
2018 7.7 5.1 5 4 0
2017 3.6 1.8 3 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · CA · San Rafael

4,127 Continuing care retirement communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 115 employers in San Rafael, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bickford of Springfield 13.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Leisure Park 13.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Copeland Oaks 13.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Carriage House 13.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Klink Citrus Association 150 FTE
STATE-SIZE Javier Ponce Nevarez 150 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mashburn Transportation Services 150 FTE
STATE-SIZE TRI Pointe Homes 150 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2032-02121151 1,372 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bay Area Community Resources 1,180 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0206-02621151 1,007 FTE
CITY-NEAR 02821151 SAN RAFAEL HOSPITAL 834 FTE
NAT-TCR Butler Hauling Operations and Sanitary Landfill 13.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Sata USA INC 13.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Pacific Veneer 13.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Eastern Oregon Youth Correctional Facility 13.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Emerson Automation Solutions 150 FTE
NAT-SIZE Yancey's Fancy/Brickhouse Road Factory 150 FTE
NAT-SIZE Morton Salt, Silver Springs 150 FTE
NAT-SIZE RGJ, Inc. 150 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.