Skilled nursing facilities · Colorado

Villa Pueblo Senior Living Community

Pueblo, CO · ~163 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
22.7
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Villa Pueblo Senior Living Community runs at 349% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Villa Pueblo Senior Living Community: 22.7 TCR = 349% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Villa Pueblo Senior Living Community safety composite

Villa Pueblo Senior Living Community scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

15/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 22.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
F 24.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1670.9

2016→2021

Villa Pueblo Senior Living Community injury rate improved

Villa Pueblo Senior Living Community's TCR fell 1670.9 from 1698.1 in 2016 to 27.2 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2016 at 1698.1 TCR. In 2021, DART was 1.09× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1698.1 · 2017=6.9 · 2018=13.4 · 2019=21.2 · 2020=44.7 · 2021=27.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Pueblo, CO ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 22.7 · 349% of ind

  • DART 24.9 DART
  • RANK #251/259
  • PHOTO CHAUTAUQUA NURSING A…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 62 inj
  • SIZE ~163 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CHAUTAUQUA NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

Villa Pueblo Senior Living Community in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Villa Pueblo Senior Living Community averages 22.7 TCR (349% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Villa Pueblo Senior Living Community TCR series: 2016=1698.1 · 2017=6.9 · 2018=13.4 · 2019=21.2 · 2020=44.7 · 2021=27.2 · BLS 6.5

Where Villa Pueblo Senior Living Community falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #251 safest of 259 Skilled nursing facilities employers in Colorado.

Villa Pueblo Senior Living Community (163 employees, TCR 22.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Villa Pueblo Senior Living Community
Villa Pueblo Senior Living Community (163 employees, TCR 22.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Villa Pueblo Senior Living Community has more employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 27.2 24.9 5 18 0
2020 44.7 7.5 12 48 0
2019 21.2 21.2 15 0 0
2018 13.4 12.1 10 0 0
2017 6.9 5.7 11 0 0
2016 1698.1 1698.1 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · CO · Pueblo

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 209 employers in Pueblo, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CHAUTAUQUA NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER 22.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Autumnwood of McBain 22.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Woodland Oaks Healthcare Facility 22.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Clarion Healthcare and Rehabilitation 22.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Fransen Pittman General Contractors 163 FTE
STATE-SIZE Catamount Constructors Inc. Denver Division 163 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mark Young Construction 163 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Allen Company, Inc. 163 FTE
CITY-NEAR Parkview Medical Center 2,463 FTE
CITY-NEAR Parkview Health System 2,367 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Mary-Corwin Medical Center 1,451 FTE
CITY-NEAR EVRAZ Pueblo 1,128 FTE
NAT-TCR O'Fallon Ofc/Whse 22.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Pennisula/Redwood City 22.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 1582 22.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Primrose Retirement Community of Shawnee 22.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE 1285 - Lincoln Ne Whse 163 FTE
NAT-SIZE US172: Philadelphia 544 - SG 163 FTE
NAT-SIZE Raven Mechanical, LP 163 FTE
NAT-SIZE Matthews Granite- Star / Elite 163 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.