Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Washington

Village Concepts Of Marysville-Grandview Village

Marysville, WA · ~22 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Village Concepts Of Marysville-Grandview Village runs at 342% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Village Concepts Of Marysville-Grandview Village: 13.0 TCR = 342% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Village Concepts Of Marysville-Grandview Village safety composite

Village Concepts Of Marysville-Grandview Village scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Village Concepts Of Marysville-Grandview Village: 0.2 → 16.7 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 22.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Village Concepts Of Marysville-Grandview Village's TCR rose 16.5 from 0.2 in 2022 to 16.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 22.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Marysville, WA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 13.0 · 342% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #159/216
  • PHOTO Oakmont of Camarillo
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Oakmont of Camarillo (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Village Concepts Of Marysville-Grandview Village in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Village Concepts Of Marysville-Grandview Village averages 13.0 TCR (342% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Village Concepts Of Marysville-Grandview Village TCR series: 2022=0.2 · 2023=22.2 · 2024=16.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Village Concepts Of Marysville-Grandview Village falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 18% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #159 safest of 216 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Washington.

Village Concepts Of Marysville-Grandview Village (22 employees, TCR 13.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Village Concepts Of Marysville-Grandview Village
Village Concepts Of Marysville-Grandview Village (22 employees, TCR 13.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Village Concepts Of Marysville-Grandview Village has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 16.7 0.0 2 1 0
2023 22.2 11.1 4 0 0
2022 0.2 0.1 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · WA · Marysville

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 67 employers in Marysville, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Oakmont of Camarillo 13.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR McDowell Village 13.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Leesburg MC 13.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Satilla Bluffs Senior Care 13.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE A&K Orchards Inc. 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE MLDCN-MLDIV-CONNELL CATTLE FEEDERS 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gulf Mist, Inc. 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE ITC Services- Pasco 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2595 327 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Marysville, Washington 326 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0642 - MARYSVILLE WA WHSE 317 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 3801 312 FTE
NAT-TCR Headquarters 13.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Vulkor 13.0 TCR
NAT-TCR UCP Ose 13.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 1506 - Odessa 13.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Rose Lake 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Penn Stone 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fontanelle 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chapel steel-location 141 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.