Firefighting (except forest), government and volunteer (except private) · Illinois

Village of Hanover Park Fire

Hanover Park, IL · ~47 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.7
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Village of Hanover Park Fire runs at 366% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Firefighting (except forest), government and volunteer (except private) workplace, earning a grade F.

Village of Hanover Park Fire: 11.7 TCR = 366% of Firefighting (except forest), government and volunteer (except private) BLS 3.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Village of Hanover Park Fire safety composite

Village of Hanover Park Fire scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 11.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

DART rate
D 6.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.5

2017→2019

Village of Hanover Park Fire injury rate improved

Village of Hanover Park Fire's TCR fell 2.5 from 12.9 in 2017 to 10.5 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 12.9 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.54× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=12.9 · 2019=10.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 922160 · Hanover Park, IL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.7 · 366% of ind

  • DART 6.3 DART
  • RANK #168/262
  • PHOTO Village of Northbroo…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Village of Northbrook - Fire (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Village of Hanover Park Fire in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Village of Hanover Park Fire averages 11.7 TCR (366% of the Firefighting (except forest), government and volunteer (except private) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Village of Hanover Park Fire TCR series: 2017=12.9 · 2019=10.5 · BLS 3.2

Where Village of Hanover Park Fire falls in its industry

793 Firefighting (except forest), establishments

Safer than 39% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 9.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #168 safest of 262 Firefighting (except forest), employers in Illinois.

Village of Hanover Park Fire (47 employees, TCR 11.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 9.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Village of Hanover Park Fire
Village of Hanover Park Fire (47 employees, TCR 11.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 9.8

Village of Hanover Park Fire has fewer employees than the Firefighting (except forest), government median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 9.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 10.5 6.3 5 0 0
2017 12.9 12.9 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

922160 · IL · Hanover Park

793 Firefighting (except forest), government and volunteer (except private) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 51 employers in Hanover Park, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Village of Northbrook - Fire 11.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gardner Fire Protection District 11.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fire Station 3 11.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fire 11.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE 1987-Jerseyville, IL (Monsanto Co.) 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stonington, IL-Mfg 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Prairie Power, Inc. 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN ILLINOIS - Distribution Operating - Decatur 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pentair Filtration Solutions, LLC - Hanover Park 287 FTE
CITY-NEAR MWD 273 FTE
CITY-NEAR Camcraft, Inc. 254 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hanover Park 239 FTE
NAT-TCR Fresno Area Express (FAX) 11.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Governor's House 11.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Alexandria (Gravel Avenue) 11.7 TCR
NAT-TCR La Plata Center 11.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE SAN - Provisioning 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tucker Printers 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stericycle Environmental Solutions - Gary,IN 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hospital Couriers Florida (North) 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.