Labels, commercial printing (except screen), on a job-order basis · California

Vintage 99 Label MFG, Inc.

Name: Vintage 99 Label MFG, Inc. Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Livermore, CA · ~24 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

B
Good Safety Record: 2.5
Avg TCR: 3.3
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Vintage 99 Label MFG, Inc. runs at 75% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Labels, commercial printing (except screen), on a job-order basis workplace, earning a grade B.

Vintage 99 Label MFG, Inc.: 2.5 TCR = 75% of Labels, commercial printing (except screen), on a job-order basis BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Vintage 99 Label MFG, Inc. safety composite

Vintage 99 Label MFG, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): D 2.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers
DART rate: B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Vintage 99 Label MFG, Inc. held a steady TCR band

Vintage 99 Label MFG, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 7.4 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=7.4 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 323111 · Livermore, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.5 · 75% of ind

DART 0.0 DART
RANK #56/150
PHOTO Heartland Label LC
BOOK 3y book
INJ 2 inj
SIZE ~24 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Heartland Label LC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

This site

2.5
Heartland Labe

2.5
Custom Deco, L

2.5
Multi-Color Co

2.5
Venture Soluti

2.5

What this shows Vintage 99 Label MFG, Inc. averages 2.5 TCR (75% of the Labels, commercial printing (except screen), on a job-order basis BLS benchmark).

Vintage 99 Label MFG, Inc. TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=7.4 · 2019=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Vintage 99 Label MFG, Inc. falls in its industry

2,001 Labels, commercial printing (e establishments

Safer than 53% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

Grade B

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #56 safest of 150 Labels, commercial printing (e employers in California.

Vintage 99 Label MFG, Inc. (24 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Vintage 99 Label MFG, Inc. has fewer employees than the Labels, commercial printing (except scre median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	Injuries
2019	0.0	0
2018	7.4	2
2017	0.0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

323111 · CA · Livermore

2,001 Labels, commercial printing (except screen), on a job-order basis employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 296 employers in Livermore, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Heartland Label LC	LITTLE CHUTE, WI	2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Custom Deco, LLC.	TOLEDO, OH	2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Multi-Color Corporation F&B Clarksville	CLARKSVILLE, TN	2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Venture Solutions - FT Worth TX - 0093-TXFO1	FORT WORTH, TX	2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Agro-Jal Farming Enterprises	SANTA MARIA	24 FTE
STATE-SIZE	MTD Farms	FIREBAUGH	24 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Marc Pura Ranch, LLC	GREENFIELD	24 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Costa Farms	TRACY	24 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Retail Merchandising Solutions, LLC	Livermore	4,717 FTE
CITY-NEAR	California Department of Transportation Facility 577	Livermore	2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Gillig LLC	Livermore	940 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Fat Chance Entertainment	Livermore	917 FTE
NAT-TCR	St. Ann Rest Home	Milwaukee, WI	2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR	Overhead Door Co of Sioux Falls, Inc	Sioux Falls, SD	2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR	REN003 Lancaster	York, PA	2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR	Perkins Pacific	Ridgefield, WA	2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Innocor Foam Technologies, LLC - Dubuque	Dubuque, IA	24 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Moore Transport - Dundalk	Baltimore, MD	24 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Moore Transport - Walkertown	Walkertown, NC	24 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Faf Clt	Charlotte, NC	24 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.