Wines merchant wholesalers · Ohio

Vintage Wine Distributor Columbus

Columbus, OH · ~56 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Vintage Wine Distributor Columbus runs at 110% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Wines merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade C.

Vintage Wine Distributor Columbus: 2.4 TCR = 110% of Wines merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Vintage Wine Distributor Columbus safety composite

Vintage Wine Distributor Columbus scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Vintage Wine Distributor Columbus: 1.5 → 5.6 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 6.0 TCR · DART/TCR 2.32× in 2023

Vintage Wine Distributor Columbus's TCR rose 4.1 from 1.5 in 2016 to 5.6 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 6.0 TCR. In 2023, DART was 2.32× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 424820 · Columbus, OH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.4 · 110% of ind

  • DART 5.6 DART
  • RANK #12/29
  • PHOTO 738 YOUNG S MARKET-T…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~56 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 738 YOUNG S MARKET-TUSTIN (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Vintage Wine Distributor Columbus in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Vintage Wine Distributor Columbus averages 2.4 TCR (110% of the Wines merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Vintage Wine Distributor Columbus TCR series: 2016=1.5 · 2017=3.3 · 2018=0 · 2019=6 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=3 · 2023=5.6 · BLS 2.2

Where Vintage Wine Distributor Columbus falls in its industry

735 Wines merchant wholesalers establishments

Safer than 77% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 29 Wines merchant wholesalers employers in Ohio.

Vintage Wine Distributor Columbus (56 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 109 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Vintage Wine Distributor Columbus
Vintage Wine Distributor Columbus (56 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 109 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Vintage Wine Distributor Columbus has fewer employees than the Wines merchant wholesalers median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 5.6 5.6 2 0 0
2022 3.0 3.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 6.0 0.0 4 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 3.3 3.3 2 0 0
2016 1.5 1.5 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

424820 · OH · Columbus

735 Wines merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 1,500 employers in Columbus, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 738 YOUNG S MARKET-TUSTIN 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 720 YOUNG S MARKET-PLEASANTON 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4609-1103 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4818-MDMD 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Rindler Poultry LLC 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Canton General Service Center 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE 919-NiSource-Chillicothe OH-Three Rivers Op 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE 977-NiSource-Findlay OH-Lake Erie Op Ctr 56 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nationwide Children's Hospital 13,367 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nationwide Children's Hospital Main Campus 10,116 FTE
CITY-NEAR Riverside Methodist Hospital 9,759 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CMH1 5,057 FTE
NAT-TCR Baylor Scott & White McLane Children's Medical Center 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Davenport Service Center 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #516 CRYSTAL RIVER, FL 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Bennett Supply Co 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Southern Hobby Distribution-NSH 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gregory Poole Lift Systems- Chesapeake 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Staunton District Bridge Crews 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Richmond District Bridge Crews 56 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.