Aluminum smelting, secondary, and making ingot and billet (except by rolling) · Georgia

Vista Metals Georgia

Adairsville, GA · ~225 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Vista Metals Georgia runs at 199% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Aluminum smelting, secondary, and making ingot and billet (except by rolling) workplace, earning a grade D.

Vista Metals Georgia: 6.6 TCR = 199% of Aluminum smelting, secondary, and making ingot and billet (except by rolling) BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Vista Metals Georgia safety composite

Vista Metals Georgia scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.7

2016→2024

Vista Metals Georgia injury rate improved

Vista Metals Georgia's TCR fell 4.7 from 10.2 in 2016 to 5.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 11.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.74× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=10.2 · 2017=5.1 · 2018=6.2 · 2019=11.5 · 2020=5.2 · 2021=4.3 · 2022=6.4 · 2023=4.9 · 2024=5.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331314 · Adairsville, GA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.6 · 199% of ind

  • DART 4.8 DART
  • RANK P27
  • PHOTO Imperial Aluminum-Sc…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 125 inj
  • SIZE ~225 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Imperial Aluminum-Scottsboro (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Vista Metals Georgia in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Vista Metals Georgia averages 6.6 TCR (199% of the Aluminum smelting, secondary, and making ingot and billet (except by rolling) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Vista Metals Georgia TCR series: 2016=10.2 · 2017=5.1 · 2018=6.2 · 2019=11.5 · 2020=5.2 · 2021=4.3 · 2022=6.4 · 2023=4.9 · 2024=5.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Vista Metals Georgia falls in its industry

103 Aluminum smelting, secondary, establishments

Safer than 27% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Vista Metals Georgia (225 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Vista Metals Georgia
Vista Metals Georgia (225 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Vista Metals Georgia has more employees than the Aluminum smelting, secondary, and making median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.5 4.8 16 1 0
2023 4.9 1.7 16 1 0
2022 6.4 5.1 20 0 0
2021 4.3 2.6 10 0 0
2020 5.2 4.2 8 2 0
2019 11.5 4.7 22 10 0
2018 6.2 3.4 13 0 0
2017 5.1 3.2 8 0 0
2016 10.2 9.4 12 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331314 · GA · Adairsville

103 Aluminum smelting, secondary, and making ingot and billet (except by rolling) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 39 employers in Adairsville, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Imperial Aluminum-Scottsboro 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Custom Alloy Sales 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Recycling Services of Indiana 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arconic Mill Products Inc. 6.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Corporate Jackson EMC 225 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brooks-Berry-Haynie & Associates 225 FTE
STATE-SIZE ELITE FLOORING AND DESIGN INC 225 FTE
STATE-SIZE Polar Southern Bottling 225 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2807-1457 848 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1457 LOWE S NORTHERN GA RDC 747 FTE
CITY-NEAR Plant L3/LG 503 FTE
CITY-NEAR Plant L3 404 FTE
NAT-TCR Rosauers Supermarkets, Inc. #7 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Action Gypsum Supply West Chino 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Orlando Operations 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Fluidra USA 6.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mease Life, Inc. 225 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4C Foods Corp 225 FTE
NAT-SIZE Taylor Promotional Products - NY - 0066 225 FTE
NAT-SIZE East West Wisconsin 225 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.