Quick Service Restaurant · California

VITALIGENT LLC Roseville V Pleasant Grove 632

Roseville, CA · ~23 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.8
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

VITALIGENT LLC Roseville V Pleasant Grove 632 runs at 227% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Quick Service Restaurant workplace, earning a grade F.

VITALIGENT LLC Roseville V Pleasant Grove 632: 6.8 TCR = 227% of Quick Service Restaurant BLS 3.0 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

VITALIGENT LLC Roseville V Pleasant Grove 632 safety composite

VITALIGENT LLC Roseville V Pleasant Grove 632 scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

VITALIGENT LLC Roseville V Pleasant Grove 632: 0.0 → 9.0 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 11.4 TCR · DART/TCR 1.33× in 2021

VITALIGENT LLC Roseville V Pleasant Grove 632's TCR rose 9.0 from 0.0 in 2019 to 9.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 11.4 TCR. In 2021, DART was 1.33× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 722513 · Roseville, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.8 · 227% of ind

  • DART 9.0 DART
  • RANK #152/264
  • PHOTO King Taco Restaurant…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: King Taco Restaurant, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

VITALIGENT LLC Roseville V Pleasant Grove 632 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows VITALIGENT LLC Roseville V Pleasant Grove 632 averages 6.8 TCR (227% of the Quick Service Restaurant BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

VITALIGENT LLC Roseville V Pleasant Grove 632 TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=11.4 · 2021=9 · BLS 3.0

Where VITALIGENT LLC Roseville V Pleasant Grove 632 falls in its industry

1,014 Quick Service Restaurant establishments

Safer than 33% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #152 safest of 264 Quick Service Restaurant employers in California.

VITALIGENT LLC Roseville V Pleasant Grove 632 (23 employees, TCR 6.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 34 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate VITALIGENT LLC Roseville V Pleasant Grove 632
VITALIGENT LLC Roseville V Pleasant Grove 632 (23 employees, TCR 6.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 34 employees and a TCR of 4.8

VITALIGENT LLC Roseville V Pleasant Grove 632 has fewer employees than the Quick Service Restaurant median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 9.0 9.0 0 1 0
2020 11.4 11.4 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

722513 · CA · Roseville

1,014 Quick Service Restaurant employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 311 employers in Roseville, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR King Taco Restaurant, Inc. 6.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Denny's Store #400 6.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sonic Drive-In Corona #6448 6.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Taco Bell #33074 6.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE James Diedrich Farms 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tri-Fanucchi Farms,LLC 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE KAN2 - 04 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kyer Farms 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2032-02121801 4,395 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sutter Valley Hospitals (30003) 4,383 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0206-02621801 3,172 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sutter Roseville Medical Center (110-5001) 3,162 FTE
NAT-TCR 42631b - Baltimore Dc 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Bay Logistics-Spring Lake 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 40226-Capstone Albertsons Portland or 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Kallmeyer Dedicated Freight LLC 6.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Jim Palmer Excavating 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Waterford at Woodbridge 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE WE Pulliam 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE National Highway Express 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.