Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction · Connecticut

VMS Construction Company

Vernon, CT · ~42 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

VMS Construction Company runs at 36% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction workplace, earning a grade A.

VMS Construction Company: 1.0 TCR = 36% of Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

VMS Construction Company safety composite

VMS Construction Company scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 33%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.6

2016→2024

VMS Construction Company injury rate improved

VMS Construction Company's TCR fell 0.6 from 2.9 in 2016 to 2.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 3.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 2.24× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.9 · 2017=3.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=2.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237110 · Vernon, CT AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.0 · 36% of ind

  • DART 2.3 DART
  • RANK #1/11
  • PHOTO Boone Services
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~42 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Boone Services (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

VMS Construction Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows VMS Construction Company averages 1.0 TCR (36% of the Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

VMS Construction Company TCR series: 2016=2.9 · 2017=3 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=2.3 · BLS 2.8

Where VMS Construction Company falls in its industry

1,614 Utility line (i.e., sewer, wat establishments

Safer than 86% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 11 Utility line (i.e., sewer, wat employers in Connecticut.

VMS Construction Company (42 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate VMS Construction Company
VMS Construction Company (42 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0

VMS Construction Company has fewer employees than the Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), const median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.3 2.3 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 3.0 0.0 1 0 0
2016 2.9 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237110 · CT · Vernon

1,614 Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 43 employers in Vernon, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Boone Services 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR COP Construction LLC 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Judy Construction Company - 202104 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lowe Construction, Inc 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Kronenberger & Sons Restoration, LLC 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE ROTHA Contracting Company, Inc. 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Public Works 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE New England Masonry & Roofing Co. 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rockville General Hospital 276 FTE
CITY-NEAR A Caring Hand 220 FTE
CITY-NEAR Vernon Manor HCC 179 FTE
CITY-NEAR Visiting Nurse and Health Services 176 FTE
NAT-TCR Croydon Emulsions 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Goya Foods of Virginia 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR DMI Contractors 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Starcon @ Ingredion Bedford Park 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ag Processing Inc - Emmetsburg 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jonesboro Rice Mill 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Diversified Mold & Castings 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tinley Park 42 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.