Home centers, building materials · Indiana

Von Tobel Corporation- Michigan City

Michigan City, IN · ~22 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.1
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Von Tobel Corporation- Michigan City runs at 91% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Home centers, building materials workplace, earning a grade C.

Von Tobel Corporation- Michigan City: 3.1 TCR = 91% of Home centers, building materials BLS 3.4 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Von Tobel Corporation- Michigan City safety composite

Von Tobel Corporation- Michigan City scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Von Tobel Corporation- Michigan City: 0.0 → 4.9 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 10.5 TCR · DART/TCR 1.59× in 2024

Von Tobel Corporation- Michigan City's TCR rose 4.9 from 0.0 in 2020 to 4.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 10.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.59× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 444110 · Michigan City, IN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.1 · 91% of ind

  • DART 4.9 DART
  • RANK #34/163
  • PHOTO 6814 N FORT WORTH
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 6814 N FORT WORTH (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Von Tobel Corporation- Michigan City in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Von Tobel Corporation- Michigan City averages 3.1 TCR (91% of the Home centers, building materials BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Von Tobel Corporation- Michigan City TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=10.5 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=4.9 · BLS 3.4

Where Von Tobel Corporation- Michigan City falls in its industry

6,309 Home centers, building materia establishments

Safer than 77% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #34 safest of 163 Home centers, building materia employers in Indiana.

Von Tobel Corporation- Michigan City (22 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Von Tobel Corporation- Michigan City
Von Tobel Corporation- Michigan City (22 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Von Tobel Corporation- Michigan City has fewer employees than the Home centers, building materials median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.9 4.9 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 10.5 10.5 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

444110 · IN · Michigan City

6,309 Home centers, building materials employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 111 employers in Michigan City, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 6814 N FORT WORTH 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 0236 LOWE S OF CONWAY AR 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 0693 LOWE S OF SEVIERVILLE TN 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 0729 LOWE S OF COLUMBIA TN 3.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Wilson Fertilizer, Inc. 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE MISHAWAKA CONCRETE ASPHALT RECYCLE INC 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE MCAR 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Connersville District Office 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR Franciscan Health Michigan City 938 FTE
CITY-NEAR Blue Chip Casino Hotel Spa 772 FTE
CITY-NEAR Michigan City High School 603 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hearthside Foods Solutions 602 FTE
NAT-TCR Unified Sch Dist 470 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Central Florida Landscaping, Inc. 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Gillette 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Arden Companies - Sanford 3.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE The Morgan at Provost Square 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Paul Davis Systems of Lexington, Inc. 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bbb 15490 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Franklin Residency 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.