Print shops, digital (except printing books) · Georgia

Wallace Graphics, Inc.

Duluth, GA · ~99 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Wallace Graphics, Inc. runs at 102% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Print shops, digital (except printing books) workplace, earning a grade C.

Wallace Graphics, Inc.: 3.4 TCR = 102% of Print shops, digital (except printing books) BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Wallace Graphics, Inc. safety composite

Wallace Graphics, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 54% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 37%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.7

2017→2024

Wallace Graphics, Inc. injury rate improved

Wallace Graphics, Inc.'s TCR fell 1.7 from 3.1 in 2017 to 1.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 13.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.21× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.1 · 2018=1.5 · 2019=1.4 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=1.1 · 2022=13.8 · 2023=4.4 · 2024=1.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 323111 · Duluth, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.4 · 102% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #33/51
  • PHOTO Hutchinson Printing
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~99 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hutchinson Printing (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Wallace Graphics, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Wallace Graphics, Inc. averages 3.4 TCR (102% of the Print shops, digital (except printing books) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Wallace Graphics, Inc. TCR series: 2017=3.1 · 2018=1.5 · 2019=1.4 · 2020=0 · 2021=1.1 · 2022=13.8 · 2023=4.4 · 2024=1.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Wallace Graphics, Inc. falls in its industry

2,001 Print shops, digital (except p establishments

Safer than 37% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #33 safest of 51 Print shops, digital (except p employers in Georgia.

Wallace Graphics, Inc. (99 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Wallace Graphics, Inc.
Wallace Graphics, Inc. (99 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Wallace Graphics, Inc. has more employees than the Print shops, digital (except printing bo median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.4 0.7 2 0 0
2023 4.4 1.4 6 0 0
2022 13.8 4.6 3 0 0
2021 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 1.4 0.0 2 0 0
2018 1.5 0.0 2 0 0
2017 3.1 0.8 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

323111 · GA · Duluth

2,001 Print shops, digital (except printing books) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 203 employers in Duluth, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hutchinson Printing 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR MENOMONEE FALLS WI - DISTRIB C 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stakes Manufacturing 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Taylor Comms Ontario - 0220-CAON1 3.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Ace Electric Inc. Valdosta 99 FTE
STATE-SIZE Atlanta Container 99 FTE
STATE-SIZE International Paper 99 FTE
STATE-SIZE Grenzebach Newnan 99 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northside Duluth 1,352 FTE
CITY-NEAR Boehringer Ingelheim Duluth 1,327 FTE
CITY-NEAR BI Vet Medica 1,160 FTE
CITY-NEAR 123569-NORTH METRO GA P&DC 1,103 FTE
NAT-TCR Elk Grove. 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR C078 Twinsburg PC 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Blanton Construction 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR LexTM3 - Florida 3.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE US Gypsum Detroit 99 FTE
NAT-SIZE Natural Advantage LLC, Oakdale Facility 99 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hilton Garden Inn San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge 99 FTE
NAT-SIZE TXMCF 99 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.