Smoke detectors manufacturing · Colorado

Walter Kidde Portable Equipment (Colorado Springs)

Colorado Springs, CO · ~30 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Walter Kidde Portable Equipment (Colorado Springs) runs at 21% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Smoke detectors manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Walter Kidde Portable Equipment (Colorado Springs): 0.7 TCR = 21% of Smoke detectors manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Walter Kidde Portable Equipment (Colorado Springs) safety composite

Walter Kidde Portable Equipment (Colorado Springs) scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 67% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 0.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Walter Kidde Portable Equipment (Colorado Springs) held a steady TCR band

Walter Kidde Portable Equipment (Colorado Springs)'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 3.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=3.5 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334290 · Colorado Springs, CO AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 21% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/4
  • PHOTO HMATN01
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: HMATN01 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

Walter Kidde Portable Equipment (Colorado Springs) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Walter Kidde Portable Equipment (Colorado Springs) averages 0.7 TCR (21% of the Smoke detectors manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Walter Kidde Portable Equipment (Colorado Springs) TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=3.5 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Walter Kidde Portable Equipment (Colorado Springs) falls in its industry

103 Smoke detectors manufacturing establishments

Safer than 51% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 4 Smoke detectors manufacturing employers in Colorado.

Walter Kidde Portable Equipment (Colorado Springs) (30 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 127 employees and a TCR of 0.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate Walter Kidde Portable Equipment (Colorado Springs)
Walter Kidde Portable Equipment (Colorado Springs) (30 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 127 employees and a TCR of 0.8

Walter Kidde Portable Equipment (Colorado Springs) has fewer employees than the Smoke detectors manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 3.5 0.0 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334290 · CO · Colorado Springs

103 Smoke detectors manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 832 employers in Colorado Springs, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR HMATN01 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Apollo America Inc. (AAI) 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR DRS Signal Solutions, Inc 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2636-NEVADA.RENO 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE 5280 S Services LLC 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE KP Squared LLC 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Evergreen Service Center 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Krueger Construction Management LLC 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Colorado Hospital Memorial Central 3,102 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - DEN4 2,948 FTE
CITY-NEAR Penrose Hospital 2,841 FTE
CITY-NEAR 05070001-050701 PENROSE HOSPITAL 2,391 FTE
NAT-TCR Amcor Rigid Plastics 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Schweizer Dipple Inc. 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Arconic 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Hackney Ladish INC 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Trinity Feedyard LLC 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bayview Engineering & Construction Inc 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE MBAF 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Inland Tarp Liner- Moses Lake 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.