Commercial and industrial machinery repair and maintenance services · Illinois

Walter Payton Power Equipment

Riverdale, IL · ~32 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Walter Payton Power Equipment runs at 134% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Commercial and industrial machinery repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade D.

Walter Payton Power Equipment: 2.8 TCR = 134% of Commercial and industrial machinery repair and maintenance services BLS 2.1 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Walter Payton Power Equipment safety composite

Walter Payton Power Equipment scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Walter Payton Power Equipment held a steady TCR band

Walter Payton Power Equipment's TCR held near 0.2 from 2.9 in 2017 to 2.7 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 2.9 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.97× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=2.9 · 2018=2.8 · 2019=2.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Riverdale, IL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 2.8 · 134% of ind

  • DART 2.7 DART
  • RANK #77/153
  • PHOTO Hobart Service, Cinc…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hobart Service, Cincinnati (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Walter Payton Power Equipment in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Walter Payton Power Equipment averages 2.8 TCR (134% of the Commercial and industrial machinery repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Walter Payton Power Equipment TCR series: 2017=2.9 · 2018=2.8 · 2019=2.7 · BLS 2.1

Where Walter Payton Power Equipment falls in its industry

2,560 Commercial and industrial mach establishments

Safer than 48% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #77 safest of 153 Commercial and industrial mach employers in Illinois.

Walter Payton Power Equipment (32 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Walter Payton Power Equipment
Walter Payton Power Equipment (32 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Walter Payton Power Equipment has fewer employees than the Commercial and industrial machinery repa median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 2.7 2.7 1 0 0
2018 2.8 2.8 1 0 0
2017 2.9 2.9 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · IL · Riverdale

2,560 Commercial and industrial machinery repair and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 17 employers in Riverdale, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hobart Service, Cincinnati 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wiese East Peoria 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Thielsch Engineering HQ 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Doggett Truck Enterprises 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE AMEREN ILLINOIS - Eastern 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Utility Department 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN ILLINOIS - AIC Gas Corrosion 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE NG Ottawa Reporting Center 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR ArcelorMittal Riverdale 313 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cleveland-Cliffs Riverdale 311 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tri-State Disposal Inc 48 FTE
CITY-NEAR 161580-CHI-RIVERDALE BR 46 FTE
NAT-TCR Kelco Contracting, LLC 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Manufacturing - Machine Tool 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Seminole PP; EGX Gath/Trans 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Springs Village Care Center 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE City of Long Beach, Ms. 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jasper County REMC Headquarters 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oklahoma Production Department 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Triple C Manufacturing, Inc. 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.