Restaurant equipment (except furniture) · Texas

Warren Southwest Refrigeration

Houston, TX · ~35 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
4.5
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Warren Southwest Refrigeration runs at 206% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Restaurant equipment (except furniture) workplace, earning a grade F.

Warren Southwest Refrigeration: 4.5 TCR = 206% of Restaurant equipment (except furniture) BLS 2.2 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Warren Southwest Refrigeration safety composite

Warren Southwest Refrigeration scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 28%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−11.5

2016→2020

Warren Southwest Refrigeration injury rate improved

Warren Southwest Refrigeration's TCR fell 11.5 from 11.5 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2016 at 11.5 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=11.5 · 2017=4.7 · 2018=2.2 · 2019=4.3 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423440 · Houston, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 4.5 · 206% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #9/11
  • PHOTO TriMark United East
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: TriMark United East (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Warren Southwest Refrigeration in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Warren Southwest Refrigeration averages 4.5 TCR (206% of the Restaurant equipment (except furniture) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Warren Southwest Refrigeration TCR series: 2016=11.5 · 2017=4.7 · 2018=2.2 · 2019=4.3 · 2020=0 · BLS 2.2

Where Warren Southwest Refrigeration falls in its industry

118 Restaurant equipment (except f establishments

Safer than 28% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 11 Restaurant equipment (except f employers in Texas.

Warren Southwest Refrigeration (35 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 2.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Warren Southwest Refrigeration
Warren Southwest Refrigeration (35 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 2.8

Warren Southwest Refrigeration has fewer employees than the Restaurant equipment (except furniture) median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 4.3 2.1 2 0 0
2018 2.2 2.2 1 0 0
2017 4.7 0.0 2 0 0
2016 11.5 4.6 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423440 · TX · Houston

118 Restaurant equipment (except furniture) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 5,116 employers in Houston, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR TriMark United East 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR General Hotel & Restaurant Supply Corp. 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Edward Don & Company-IL 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Foodservice Supply Smyrna 4.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Southwest Feedyard 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE CDF Dairy 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. - Marion, TX 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Growers Select Produce, Inc. 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH IAH 11,560 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH - Airport United Airlines Offices 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-IAH 9,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Methodist Hospital Texas Medical Center 8,873 FTE
NAT-TCR LKE2 Maint. Group - Auburndale 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR XPO Logistics - PHOENIX 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Commercial Warehousing Inc-Cb Depot 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR REN143 Los Angeles 4.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bendix Commercial Vehicle Systems, LLC - North Aurora 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2069-West Fargo, ND 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2527-Windfall, IN 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Burger Jones, Uptown 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.