Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Oregon

Washington Gardens Memory Care

Tigard, OR · ~48 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Washington Gardens Memory Care runs at 323% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Washington Gardens Memory Care: 12.3 TCR = 323% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Washington Gardens Memory Care safety composite

Washington Gardens Memory Care scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.6

2016→2022

Washington Gardens Memory Care injury rate improved

Washington Gardens Memory Care's TCR fell 9.6 from 9.6 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2017 at 35.0 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=9.6 · 2017=35.0 · 2018=6.8 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=2.6 · 2021=31.8 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Tigard, OR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 12.3 · 323% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #142/218
  • PHOTO Franciscan Manor
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~48 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Franciscan Manor (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Washington Gardens Memory Care in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Washington Gardens Memory Care averages 12.3 TCR (323% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Washington Gardens Memory Care TCR series: 2016=9.6 · 2017=35 · 2018=6.8 · 2019=0 · 2020=2.6 · 2021=31.8 · 2022=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Washington Gardens Memory Care falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 20% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #142 safest of 218 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Oregon.

Washington Gardens Memory Care (48 employees, TCR 12.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Washington Gardens Memory Care
Washington Gardens Memory Care (48 employees, TCR 12.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Washington Gardens Memory Care has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 31.8 31.8 3 7 0
2020 2.6 2.6 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 6.8 3.4 1 1 0
2017 35.0 19.1 10 1 0
2016 9.6 4.8 2 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · OR · Tigard

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 142 employers in Tigard, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Franciscan Manor 12.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Retreat at Lady's Island 12.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Merrill Gardens at Carolina Park 12.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Windsor Manor 12.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Forest Glen Oaks, Inc. 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Columbia River People's Utility District 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Melvin Mark Brokerage Company 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sierra OR Main and Other 48 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue 580 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue 560 FTE
CITY-NEAR PCI Portland Interior 483 FTE
CITY-NEAR 12608 415 FTE
NAT-TCR 303735-Grand Island Po 12.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Arlington Court Nursing and Rehab Center 12.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 282682-Fayette Po 12.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 287205-Stl-Wheeler Sta 12.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE NV002 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE CA012 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wheelabrator North Andover Inc. 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE DNJ Intermodal - Channahon 48 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.