Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) · District of Columbia

Washington Marriott Georgetown

Washington, DC · ~147 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.7
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Washington Marriott Georgetown runs at 256% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) workplace, earning a grade F.

Washington Marriott Georgetown: 7.7 TCR = 256% of Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) BLS 3.0 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Washington Marriott Georgetown safety composite

Washington Marriott Georgetown scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
F 17.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Washington Marriott Georgetown: 2.8 → 17.5 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 17.5 TCR · DART/TCR 2.27× in 2021

Washington Marriott Georgetown's TCR rose 14.7 from 2.8 in 2016 to 17.5 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 2.27× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 721110 · Washington, DC ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 7.7 · 256% of ind

  • DART 17.5 DART
  • RANK #63/71
  • PHOTO Holimont Inc.
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 30 inj
  • SIZE ~147 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Holimont Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · District of Columbia employers → · Look up another →

Washington Marriott Georgetown in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Washington Marriott Georgetown averages 7.7 TCR (256% of the Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Washington Marriott Georgetown TCR series: 2016=2.8 · 2017=5 · 2018=7.8 · 2019=5.4 · 2021=17.5 · BLS 3.0

Where Washington Marriott Georgetown falls in its industry

9,342 Hotel management services (i.e establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to District of Columbia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #63 safest of 71 Hotel management services (i.e employers in District of Columbia.

Washington Marriott Georgetown (147 employees, TCR 7.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Washington Marriott Georgetown
Washington Marriott Georgetown (147 employees, TCR 7.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Washington Marriott Georgetown has more employees than the Hotel management services (i.e., providi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 17.5 17.5 3 4 0
2019 5.4 2.7 8 0 0
2018 7.8 4.2 9 2 0
2017 5.0 4.3 6 1 0
2016 2.8 2.8 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

721110 · DC · Washington

9,342 Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 793 rated employers in District of Columbia with headcount on file · 748 employers in Washington, DC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Holimont Inc. 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Gallivant Hotel 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Loews Coronado Bay 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Courtyard 7.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Dynamic Concepts, Inc. 146 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2583 NE WASHINGTON DC 148 FTE
STATE-SIZE 10414 Foggy Bottom 148 FTE
STATE-SIZE 5472-NAI-0035-0035-02808 146 FTE
CITY-NEAR Children's National Medical Center 7,153 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medstar Washington Hospital Center 7,073 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medstar Georgetown University Hospital 4,771 FTE
CITY-NEAR Customs and Border Protection - Headquarters 3,601 FTE
NAT-TCR E. Contracting, Inc. 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Group C 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR MJM Holdings, Inc 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Mediamation, Inc 7.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Il. Dept. of Revenue - Chicago 147 FTE
NAT-SIZE Centuri Corporate 147 FTE
NAT-SIZE Woodland Vilage 147 FTE
NAT-SIZE Atlas Roofing Corporation, Franklin 147 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.