Intellectual and developmental disability intermediate care facilities · Florida

Washington Square

Titusville, FL · ~89 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Washington Square runs at 301% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Intellectual and developmental disability intermediate care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Washington Square: 11.4 TCR = 301% of Intellectual and developmental disability intermediate care facilities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Washington Square safety composite

Washington Square scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

24/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

DART rate
F 11.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Washington Square: 9.3 → 11.1 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 27.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0.97× in 2022

Washington Square's TCR rose 1.8 from 9.3 in 2016 to 11.1 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 27.6 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.97× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623210 · Titusville, FL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.4 · 301% of ind

  • DART 11.1 DART
  • RANK #74/92
  • PHOTO Lakemary Center, Inc…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 46 inj
  • SIZE ~89 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lakemary Center, Inc. (Paola) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Washington Square in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Washington Square averages 11.4 TCR (301% of the Intellectual and developmental disability intermediate care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Washington Square TCR series: 2016=9.3 · 2017=8.3 · 2018=7.8 · 2019=7.4 · 2020=8.7 · 2021=27.6 · 2022=11.1 · BLS 3.8

Where Washington Square falls in its industry

2,261 Intellectual and developmental establishments

Safer than 18% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #74 safest of 92 Intellectual and developmental employers in Florida.

Washington Square (89 employees, TCR 11.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Washington Square
Washington Square (89 employees, TCR 11.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8

Washington Square has more employees than the Intellectual and developmental disabilit median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 11.1 11.1 4 6 0
2021 27.6 27.6 5 17 0
2020 8.7 8.7 6 2 0
2019 7.4 6.3 7 0 0
2018 7.8 7.8 7 0 0
2017 8.3 7.3 8 0 0
2016 9.3 6.2 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623210 · FL · Titusville

2,261 Intellectual and developmental disability intermediate care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 70 employers in Titusville, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lakemary Center, Inc. (Paola) 11.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amenia ICF 11.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Filmore 11.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lumberton Admin Unit 11.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bunnell 89 FTE
STATE-SIZE Coastal Construction - Surf Club 89 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mental Health Diversion Facility 89 FTE
STATE-SIZE FIU Sipa II Phase 2 89 FTE
CITY-NEAR 649 418 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 649 410 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation US FL Titusville (1105) 374 FTE
CITY-NEAR Southeast Power Corporation 366 FTE
NAT-TCR Skyline Champion Woodland #237 11.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 398343-Tul-Northside Sta 11.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 175566-Mishawaka Po 11.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 231998-Clinton Po 11.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE MCD Innovations, Inc 89 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tucker Enhanced Graphics and Printing Plates 89 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tri-Boro Construction Supplies, Inc. 89 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hutchinson Branch Office 89 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.