Materials recovery facilities (MRF) · Georgia

Waste Pro 809 - American Recycling

Atlanta, GA · ~25 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.3
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Waste Pro 809 - American Recycling runs at 127% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Materials recovery facilities (MRF) workplace, earning a grade D.

Waste Pro 809 - American Recycling: 3.3 TCR = 127% of Materials recovery facilities (MRF) BLS 2.6 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Waste Pro 809 - American Recycling safety composite

Waste Pro 809 - American Recycling scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2018→2019

Waste Pro 809 - American Recycling injury rate improved

Waste Pro 809 - American Recycling's TCR fell 0.5 from 3.5 in 2018 to 3.1 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 3.5 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=3.5 · 2019=3.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562920 · Atlanta, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 3.3 · 127% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/11
  • PHOTO S06631 - PGI Paper V…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~25 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: S06631 - PGI Paper Valley (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Waste Pro 809 - American Recycling in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Waste Pro 809 - American Recycling averages 3.3 TCR (127% of the Materials recovery facilities (MRF) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Waste Pro 809 - American Recycling TCR series: 2018=3.5 · 2019=3.1 · BLS 2.6

Where Waste Pro 809 - American Recycling falls in its industry

422 Materials recovery facilities establishments

Safer than 56% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 11 Materials recovery facilities employers in Georgia.

Waste Pro 809 - American Recycling (25 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 3.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Waste Pro 809 - American Recycling
Waste Pro 809 - American Recycling (25 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 3.8

Waste Pro 809 - American Recycling has fewer employees than the Materials recovery facilities (MRF) median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 3.1 0.0 1 0 0
2018 3.5 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562920 · GA · Atlanta

422 Materials recovery facilities (MRF) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 1,907 employers in Atlanta, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR S06631 - PGI Paper Valley 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 27th Avenue Recycling 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR S06627 - PGI Milwaukee A-1 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sims Recycling Solutions 3.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Four Corners Gin Inc. Co. 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE W.C. Bradley Farms, Inc. 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Metro East TMC (Conyers)- 1465 General Arts Rd. Conyers, GA 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Manchester Operating - 524 Atlantic Street Manchester, GA 25 FTE
CITY-NEAR Insight Global 20,586 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - ATL Airport 19,423 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - ATL- Airport 18,018 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northside 13,761 FTE
NAT-TCR Colony Display 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Kenwal Pickling 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Mixing Warehouse/Shafter - 976 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR PEP : CPP - Rhode Island 3.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE AmeriGas - Houston, TX Liquilux Acq 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Terminix Service, Inc. Asheville NW 64- 40 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Compression Technologies and Services : SVC-New Orleans LA-USA 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Compression Technologies and Services : SVC-San Antonio TX-USA 25 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.