Containers, light gauge metal (except cans), manufacturing · Tennessee

Wastequip Eagleville

Eagleville, TN · ~92 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Wastequip Eagleville runs at 305% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Containers, light gauge metal (except cans), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Wastequip Eagleville: 10.1 TCR = 305% of Containers, light gauge metal (except cans), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Wastequip Eagleville safety composite

Wastequip Eagleville scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.4

2016→2024

Wastequip Eagleville injury rate improved

Wastequip Eagleville's TCR fell 4.4 from 7.8 in 2016 to 3.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 18.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.23× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.8 · 2017=8.9 · 2018=4.5 · 2019=14.2 · 2020=8.1 · 2021=18.9 · 2022=15.6 · 2023=9.1 · 2024=3.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332439 · Eagleville, TN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.1 · 305% of ind

  • DART 2.3 DART
  • RANK #4/4
  • PHOTO CMC Plant 2
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 86 inj
  • SIZE ~92 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CMC Plant 2 (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Wastequip Eagleville in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Wastequip Eagleville averages 10.1 TCR (305% of the Containers, light gauge metal (except cans), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Wastequip Eagleville TCR series: 2016=7.8 · 2017=8.9 · 2018=4.5 · 2019=14.2 · 2020=8.1 · 2021=18.9 · 2022=15.6 · 2023=9.1 · 2024=3.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Wastequip Eagleville falls in its industry

175 Containers, light gauge metal establishments

Safer than 16% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 4 Containers, light gauge metal employers in Tennessee.

Wastequip Eagleville (92 employees, TCR 10.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Wastequip Eagleville
Wastequip Eagleville (92 employees, TCR 10.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Wastequip Eagleville has more employees than the Containers, light gauge metal (except ca median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.4 2.3 3 0 0
2023 9.1 8.3 12 0 0
2022 15.6 5.7 22 0 0
2021 18.9 15.1 20 0 0
2020 8.1 6.8 6 0 0
2019 14.2 8.5 10 0 0
2018 4.5 4.5 3 0 0
2017 8.9 4.4 6 0 0
2016 7.8 4.7 4 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332439 · TN · Eagleville

175 Containers, light gauge metal (except cans), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 4 employers in Eagleville, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CMC Plant 2 10.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wastequip Erial 10.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rule Steel Plant 7 9.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Plant 3 & Shipping, Rule Steel 9.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE B&W Quality Growers - TN 92 FTE
STATE-SIZE King Industries Inc. 92 FTE
STATE-SIZE Safway Services, LLC - Nashville 92 FTE
STATE-SIZE Valk Industries Inc. 92 FTE
CITY-NEAR Buy Sod - Nashville 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rutherford-Eagleville 25 FTE
CITY-NEAR Buy Sod USA - Nashville Sod Farm 24 FTE
NAT-TCR Sanders Wood Products-Precision Mill 10.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Torrington Division 10.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Holmen 10.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Scott Area Recycling Center 10.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Extreme Tool 92 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of Cottage Grove 92 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jennmar West Kentucky 92 FTE
NAT-SIZE FoodTown #003 92 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.