Chemicals (except agriculture) (e.g., automotive, household, industrial, photographic) merchant wholesalers · Arkansas

Water Tech, Inc.

Fort Smith, AR · ~95 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Water Tech, Inc. runs at 49% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Chemicals (except agriculture) (e.g., automotive, household, industrial, photographic) merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade A.

Water Tech, Inc.: 1.1 TCR = 49% of Chemicals (except agriculture) (e.g., automotive, household, industrial, photographic) merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Water Tech, Inc. safety composite

Water Tech, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.5

2016→2024

Water Tech, Inc. injury rate improved

Water Tech, Inc.'s TCR fell 2.5 from 2.5 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 3.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.5 · 2017=1.1 · 2018=2.4 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=3.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.8 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 424690 · Fort Smith, AR AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 49% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK P75
  • PHOTO Richmond Distribution
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~95 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Richmond Distribution (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arkansas employers → · Look up another →

Water Tech, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Water Tech, Inc. averages 1.1 TCR (49% of the Chemicals (except agriculture) (e.g., automotive, household, industrial, photographic) merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Water Tech, Inc. TCR series: 2016=2.5 · 2017=1.1 · 2018=2.4 · 2019=0 · 2020=3 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0.8 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.2

Where Water Tech, Inc. falls in its industry

766 Chemicals (except agriculture) establishments

Safer than 75% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Water Tech, Inc. (95 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Water Tech, Inc.
Water Tech, Inc. (95 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Water Tech, Inc. has more employees than the Chemicals (except agriculture) (e.g., au median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.8 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 3.0 1.0 3 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 2.4 2.4 2 0 0
2017 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2016 2.5 1.2 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

424690 · AR · Fort Smith

766 Chemicals (except agriculture) (e.g., automotive, household, industrial, photographic) merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,393 rated employers in Arkansas with headcount on file · 249 employers in Fort Smith, AR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Richmond Distribution 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2625 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Millipore Sigma 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hillyard Co. - Lancaster 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Arkansas 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE Decatur 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brookshire's #048 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE 025-00636 95 FTE
CITY-NEAR MERCY HOSPITAL FORT SMITH 1,944 FTE
CITY-NEAR ABB Motors and Mechanical, Inc. - Fort Smith 1,298 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fort Smith - 5713 RS Boreham Jr Street 985 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baptist Health Medical Center - Fort Smith 970 FTE
NAT-TCR Library-Main 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR BEI - Bristol 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Lithonia Distribution Center 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Rhinelander Mill 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Grande Wyocena 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE Juddmonte Management LLC 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE Holland 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE Purity- Grand Rapids 95 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.