Addition, alteration and renovation, commercial and institutional building · Missouri

Waterhout Headquarters

St Louis, MO · ~95 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Waterhout Headquarters runs at 79% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Addition, alteration and renovation, commercial and institutional building workplace, earning a grade B.

Waterhout Headquarters: 2.3 TCR = 79% of Addition, alteration and renovation, commercial and institutional building BLS 2.9 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Waterhout Headquarters safety composite

Waterhout Headquarters scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Waterhout Headquarters: 1.0 → 2.4 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 4.3 TCR · DART/TCR 1.03× in 2024

Waterhout Headquarters's TCR rose 1.4 from 1.0 in 2020 to 2.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 4.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.03× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · St Louis, MO AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.3 · 79% of ind

  • DART 2.4 DART
  • RANK #56/122
  • PHOTO 1014 - BELFOR Atlant…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~95 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 1014 - BELFOR Atlanta GA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

Waterhout Headquarters in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Waterhout Headquarters averages 2.3 TCR (79% of the Addition, alteration and renovation, commercial and institutional building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Waterhout Headquarters TCR series: 2020=1 · 2021=1.4 · 2022=4.3 · 2023=2.4 · 2024=2.4 · BLS 2.9

Where Waterhout Headquarters falls in its industry

4,692 Addition, alteration and renov establishments

Safer than 50% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #56 safest of 122 Addition, alteration and renov employers in Missouri.

Waterhout Headquarters (95 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Waterhout Headquarters
Waterhout Headquarters (95 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Waterhout Headquarters has more employees than the Addition, alteration and renovation, com median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.4 2.4 2 0 0
2023 2.4 1.2 2 0 0
2022 4.3 3.3 4 0 0
2021 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2020 1.0 1.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · MO · St Louis

4,692 Addition, alteration and renovation, commercial and institutional building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 349 employers in St Louis, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 1014 - BELFOR Atlanta GA 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR AGM-Tennessee 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pavarini McGovern LLC 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Banes General Contractors, Inc. 2.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Septagon Construction Company, Incorporated-Sedalia 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE Herzog Contracting Corp - KC Streetcar Constructors 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE JPI Glass 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE Marceline Admin 95 FTE
CITY-NEAR MERCY HOSPITAL ST LOUIS 5,790 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Hospital South 3,776 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4M Building Solutions 2,111 FTE
CITY-NEAR HES Facilities Services Higher Education 1,607 FTE
NAT-TCR Store 0102 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR GENERAL TECHNOLOGIES - Seagoville 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 1093 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 978-NiSource-Middleburg Hgts OH-NE Op Ctr 2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Tru-Grind, Inc. 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE Arbors at Milford 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE Arbors at Gallipolis 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tri-State Utilities 95 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.