Animal except Poultry Slaughtering · Iowa

Waterloo Pork Plant

Waterloo, IA · ~2,801 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Waterloo Pork Plant runs at 365% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Animal except Poultry Slaughtering workplace, earning a grade F.

Waterloo Pork Plant: 12.0 TCR = 365% of Animal except Poultry Slaughtering BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Waterloo Pork Plant safety composite

Waterloo Pork Plant scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 55% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

Fatalities
C 0

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.9

2017→2024

Waterloo Pork Plant injury rate improved

Waterloo Pork Plant's TCR fell 6.9 from 13.0 in 2017 to 6.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 21.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.3× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=13.0 · 2018=7.9 · 2019=5.0 · 2020=13.0 · 2021=20.6 · 2022=21.4 · 2023=9.2 · 2024=6.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311611 · Waterloo, IA ABOVE-IND · LARGE

Grade F · TCR 12.0 · 365% of ind

  • DART 3.6 DART
  • RANK #23/26
  • PHOTO Keokuk Hills Beef Co…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 717 inj
  • SIZE ~2,801 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Keokuk Hills Beef Company LLC (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Iowa employers → · Look up another →

Waterloo Pork Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Waterloo Pork Plant averages 12.0 TCR (365% of the Animal except Poultry Slaughtering BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Waterloo Pork Plant TCR series: 2017=13 · 2018=7.9 · 2019=5 · 2020=13 · 2021=20.6 · 2022=21.4 · 2023=9.2 · 2024=6.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Waterloo Pork Plant falls in its industry

212 Animal except Poultry Slaughte establishments

Safer than 14% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Iowa alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #23 safest of 26 Animal except Poultry Slaughte employers in Iowa.

Waterloo Pork Plant (2,801 employees, TCR 12.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 297 employees and a TCR of 5.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Waterloo Pork Plant
Waterloo Pork Plant (2,801 employees, TCR 12.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 297 employees and a TCR of 5.3

Waterloo Pork Plant has more employees than the Animal except Poultry Slaughtering median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.1 3.6 102 68 0
2023 9.2 6.6 108 135 0
2022 21.4 18.6 79 463 0
2021 20.6 19.2 88 490 0
2020 13.0 11.8 62 293 0
2019 5.0 4.0 79 62 0
2018 7.9 6.2 89 125 0
2017 13.0 11.5 110 230 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311611 · IA · Waterloo

212 Animal except Poultry Slaughtering employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,192 rated employers in Iowa with headcount on file · 172 employers in Waterloo, IA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Keokuk Hills Beef Company LLC 12.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pioneer Meats, Inc. 11.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Marcho Farms, Inc. 12.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Central Valley Meat Company 11.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Whirlpool 2,940 FTE
STATE-SIZE St. Luke's Methodist Hospital 2,949 FTE
STATE-SIZE Des Moines Medical Center Hospital-MHS-IA/NE 2,985 FTE
STATE-SIZE UnityPoint Health-St Luke's Hospital 2,610 FTE
CITY-NEAR Black Hawk County Extension 4,790 FTE
CITY-NEAR UnityPoint 2,295 FTE
CITY-NEAR JD Waterloo Tractor and Cab Assembly Operations 1,605 FTE
CITY-NEAR John Deere Waterloo Product Engineering Center 1,492 FTE
NAT-TCR Robinson Fans Florida 12.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 1262 12.0 TCR
NAT-TCR CAS019 12.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Farmweld 12.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE MasTec MNS Wireless 2,801 FTE
NAT-SIZE Support Services Campus 2,800 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amgen USA (Sales - Flex workers) 2,803 FTE
NAT-SIZE UPMC Mercy 2,803 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.